期刊文献+

不同环境规制下基于微分博弈的供应链低碳协调策略研究 被引量:2

Research on Low Carbon Coordination Strategy of Supply Chain Based on Differential Game under Different Environmental Regulations
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对制造商及零售商的低碳行为,建立微分博弈模型,研究市场、政府和供应链三种环境规制下成员的最优策略。结果表明:不同环境规制下,制造商低碳投入、零售商促销努力及双方所得利润之间存在差异,且以供应链为基础时可实现最大化。进一步通过灵敏度分析,得出不同环境规制下,产品绿色度、商誉及成员利润都随时间的推移显著增加但增加速率不同;不同环境规制比较下,政府及制造商补贴都能促进成员利润的增加,但其差异增加速率不同。说明政府及制造商补贴分别在不同环境规制下起作用,因此,政府环境规制下制造商应做出更大的低碳投入努力,而供应链环境规制下零售商需做出更大的促销努力。 This paper aims at the low-carbon behavior of manufacturers and retailers,establishes a differential game model,and studies the optimal strategies of members under the three environmental regulations of market,government and supply chain.The results show that:under different environmental regulations,there are differences between manufacturers’ low-carbon investment,retailers’ promotion efforts and their profits,which can be maximized based on the supply chain.Further through sensitivity analysis,it is concluded that under different environmental regulations,product greenness,goodwill and member profits all increase significantly with the passage of time,but at different rates.Under different environmental regulations,government and manufacturer subsidies can both promote the increase of members’ profits,but the rate of difference is different.It shows that government and manufacturer subsidies play a role under different environmental regulations,so manufacturers should make greater efforts in low-carbon investment under government environmental regulations,while retailers should make greater efforts in promotion under supply chain environmental regulations.
作者 曹英 杨晓艳 CAO Ying;YANG Xiaoyan(School of Economics and Management,Taiyuan University of Technology,Jinzhong Shanxi 030600,China)
出处 《生态经济》 北大核心 2020年第8期41-48,共8页 Ecological Economy
基金 山西省软科学项目“山西省协同创新能力对可持续供应链绩效的影响路径研究”(2017041017-6)。
关键词 供应链 环境规制 产品绿色度 商誉 微分博弈 supply chain environment regulation product greenness goodwill differential game
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献59

  • 1IPCC, 2007: Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [M3. Cambrid-ze : Cambridge University Press. 2007.
  • 2Bernard A, et al. A two-level dynamic game of carbon emission trading between Russia, China, and Annex B countries I'J]. Journal of Economic Dynamics - Control, 2008,32 (6) : 1830- 1856.
  • 3Holtsmark B, Sommervoll D E. International emissions trading: Good or bad? [J]. Economics Letters, 2012,117(1) .. 362- 364.
  • 4De Cian E, Tavoni M. Do technology externalities justify restrictions on emission permit trading? I-J]. Resource and Energy Economics, 2012,34 (4) : 624 646.
  • 5Jiang J J, Ye B, Ma X M. The construction of Shenzhen's carbon emission trading scheme [JT. Energy Policy, 2014,75 : 17 - 21.
  • 6Eyland T,Zaccour G. Carbon tariffs and cooperative outcomes[J]. Energy Policy, 2014,65 : 718- 728.
  • 7Urpelainen J. Strategic problems in North-South climate finance.. Creating joint gains for donors and recipients I-J]. Environmental Science and Policy, 2012,21(1) :14-23.
  • 8Lukas E, Welling A. Timing and eco (nomic) efficiency of climate-friendly investments in supplychains [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2014,233 (2) : 448- 457.
  • 9Fan L, Norman C S, Patt A G. Electricity capacity investment under risk aversion- A case study of coal, gas, and concentrated solar power[J]. Energy Economics, 2012,34 (1) .. 54- 61.
  • 10Tahvonen O. Carbon dioxide abatement as a differential game[J]. European Journal of Political Economy, 1994,10 (4) - 685 - 705.

共引文献60

同被引文献20

引证文献2

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部