期刊文献+

引导想象放松训练对妇科恶性肿瘤患者疼痛自我效能和生命质量的影响 被引量:23

Effect of guided imagery relaxation therapy on pain self-efficacy and quality of life in patients with gynecological malignant tumor
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨引导想象放松训练对妇科恶性肿瘤患者疼痛自我效能和生命质量的影响。方法将94例妇科恶性肿瘤患者按照随机数字表法分为试验组和对照组各47例,对照组给予常规护理,试验组实施为期4周的引导想象放松训练。分别于干预前和干预后采用中文版简明疼痛评估量表(BPI-C)评价患者疼痛程度,慢性疼痛自我效能感量表(CPSS)评价患者的自我效能感,癌症生命质量核心量表(QLQ-C30)评价患者的生命质量。结果干预4周后试验组BPI-C量表中目前疼痛程度、24 h内最剧烈疼痛程度、平均疼痛程度得分以及QLQ-C30量表中症状领域、其他领域得分分别为(3.76±0.54)、(4.37±1.39)、(3.63±0.73)、(32.40±8.69)、(34.34±5.81)分,低于对照组的(4.18±0.93)、(5.18±1.75)、(4.23±0.97)、(37.72±6.37)、(38.54±6.84)分,2组比较差异有统计学意义(t值为2.415~3.287,均P<0.05)。干预4周后CPSS量表中疼痛管理自我效能感、功能性自我效能感、症状应对自我效能感、CPSS总分以及QLQ-C30量表中功能领域、总体健康状况得分分别为(17.43±5.50)、(27.25±4.40)、(29.76±6.46)、(74.44±9.21)、(72.73±17.74)、(64.02±11.03)分,明显高于对照组的(14.68±3.53)、(22.60±4.01)、(24.87±4.03)、(62.14±7.10)、(65.60±13.89)、(57.23±15.60),差异有统计学意义(t值为2.105~7.036,P<0.05或0.01)。结论引导想象放松训练可有效减轻妇科恶性肿瘤患者癌性疼痛,提高其疼痛自我管理效能感和生命质量。 Objective To investigate the effect of guided imagery relaxation therapy on pain self-efficacy and quality of life in patients with gynecological malignant tumor.Methods A total of 94 gynecological malignant tumor patients were assigned to study group and control group by random digits table method with 47 cases each,the control group received routine nursing,while the study group carried out guided imagery relaxation therapy for 4 weeks.The pain degree,pain self-efficacy and quality of life was assessed by Chinese version of Brief Pain Inventory(BPI-C),Chronic Pain Self-efficacy Scale(CPSS)and Quality of Life Questionnaire-core 30(QLQ-C30),before and 4-week after intervention.Results Compared to the control group,the scores of pain right now,pain at worst in the 24 hours,pain on the average of BPI-C and symptom scales,single items of QLQ-C30 were(3.76±0.54),(4.37±1.39),(3.63±0.73),(32.40±8.69),(34.34±5.81)points in the study group,and(4.18±0.93),(5.18±1.75),(4.23±0.97),(37.72±6.37),(38.54±6.84)points in the control group,the differences were statistically significant(t values were 2.415-3.287,all P<0.05).The scores of self-efficacy for pain management,self-efficacy for physical function,self-efficacy for coping with symptoms,total CPSS total scale and function scales,global QOL scale were(17.43±5.50),(27.25±4.40),(29.76±6.46),(74.44±9.21),(72.73±17.74),(64.02±11.03)points in the study group,and(14.68±3.53),(22.60±4.01),(24.87±4.03),(62.14±7.10),(65.60±13.89),(57.23±15.60)points in the control group,the differences were statistically significant(t values were 2.105-7.036,P<0.05 or 0.01).Conclusions Guided imagery relaxation therapy can alleviate cancerous pain and promote pain self-efficacy and quality of life of patients with gynecological malignant tumor.
作者 陶风英 黄平 禹琦 Tao Fengying;Huang Ping;Yu Qi(Department of Second-Order Tumor,Qingdao Municipal Hospital,Qingdao 266012,China;Department of Static Distribution Center,Qingdao Municipal Hospital,Qingdao 266012,China)
出处 《中国实用护理杂志》 2020年第22期1689-1694,共6页 Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing
关键词 引导想象放松训练 妇科恶性肿瘤 癌性疼痛 生活质量 Guided imagery relaxation therapy Gynecological malignant tumor Cancerous pain Quality of life
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献57

  • 1李春波,李晨虎,张旭,吴文源,何燕玲,张明园.自我效能量表的信度及效度研究[J].上海精神医学,2003,15(z1):36-38. 被引量:32
  • 2姜宝法,刘春晓,崔永春,徐涛,徐敏,王家林,杜君.EORTCQLQ-C30的信度、效度研究[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2005,13(1):31-32. 被引量:118
  • 3Chaudakshetrin P. Validation of the Thai Version of Brief Pain Inventory(BPI-T) in cancer patients [ J ] . J Med Assoc Thai, 2009, 92 ( 1 ) : 34-40.
  • 4Cleeland CS. Pain assessment : global use of the Brief Pain Inventory [ J ]. Ann Acad Med Singapore, 1994, 23 ( 2 ) : 129-138.
  • 5Wang XS, Mendoza TR, Gao SZ, et al. The Chinese version of the Brief Pain Inventory(BPI-C) : its development and use in a study of cancer pain [ J ] . Pain, 1996, 67 ( 2-3 ) : 407-416.
  • 6Ger LP, Ho ST, Sun WZ, et al. Validation of the brief pain inventory in a Taiwan Residents population [ J ] . J Pain Symptom Manage, 1999, 18 ( 5 ) : 316-322.
  • 7Mor V,Laliberte L,Morris JM,et al.The Kamofsky Performance Status Scale:An examination of its reliability and validity in a research setting.Cancer 1984; 53(9):2002-7.
  • 8Schag CAC,Ganz PA,Wing DS,et al.Quality of life in adult survivors of lung,colon and prostate cancer.Qual Life Res 1994;3(2):127-41.
  • 9EORTC Quality of Life Group.EORTC QLQ-C30 Scoring Manual.Third edition,Brussels :QL Coordinator,Quality of Life Unit,EORTC Data Center 2001.
  • 10Humy C,Bernhard J,Gelber RD,et al.Quality of life measures for patients receiving adjuvant therapy for breast cancer:an international trial.Eur J Cancer 1992;28(1):118-24.

共引文献553

同被引文献278

引证文献23

二级引证文献63

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部