期刊文献+

公众参与社区更新机制比较研究 被引量:3

A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MECHANISMS OF PUBLIC PARTICIPATION IN COMMUNITY REGENERATION
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在中共十九大提出打造“共建共治共享”的社会治理格局和我国城市规划进入存量时代的大背景下,公众参与社区更新机制的研究非常重要。文中首先对英国、中国台湾和中国大陆公众参与社区更新的状况进行了介绍,进而从参与目标与主体角色、NGO作用、法律法规政策支持、组织保障、资金来源和参与特色等六个方面,对他们的公众参与社区更新的机制进行了深入比较分析,最后针对我国大陆公众参与社区更新存在的问题,提出改进建议。 The 19th CPC National Congress proposed to build a social governance pattern of“co-construction,co-governance and sharing”,and urban planning in China has entered the stock era.In this context,it is very important to study the public participation mechanism in community regeneration.Firstly,this paper introduces the situation of public participation in community regeneration in Britain,Taiwan District,and mainland of China.Then the author makes a deep comparison of the their public participation mechanism in community regeneration from six aspects,which are,participation goal and subject role,NGO functions,supporting laws and regulations policy,organization safeguard,fund source,and participation characteristics.Finally,according to the problems of public participation in community regeneration in the mainland of China,this paper puts forward some suggestions for improvement.
作者 赵丛霞 周鹏光 ZHAO Congxia;ZHOU Pengguang(School of Architecture,Harbin Institute of Technology,Key Laboratory of Cold Region Urban and Rural Human Settlement Environment Science and Technology,Ministry of Industry and Information Technology,Harbin 150006,China)
出处 《低温建筑技术》 2020年第7期10-15,35,共7页 Low Temperature Architecture Technology
关键词 共建共治共享 存量规划 公众参与 社区更新 比较研究 co-construction co-governance and sharing stock urban planning public participation community regeneration comparative study
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献40

  • 1张民巍,秦艳.守望相助 知礼立德——著名社会学家费孝通接受本刊专访[J].社区,2001(11):4-6. 被引量:2
  • 2叶炜.英国社区自助建设对我国社区更新的启示[J].规划师,2006,22(3):61-63. 被引量:14
  • 3Clapham D. Rational Planning and Politics: The Example of Local Authority Corporate Planning[J]. Policy and Politics, 1984, (1): 31-52.
  • 4Pierson J, Worley C. Housing and Urban Regeneration Policy: Citizen and Community Under New Labour. In: Peter Somerville and Nigel Sprigings ed. Housing and Social Policy: Contemporary Themes and Critical Perspectives[M]. London: Routledae. 2005.
  • 5Robson B, ParKinson M, Bobby M, Maclennan D. Assessing the Impact of Urban Policy[M]. London: HMSO. 1994.
  • 6Smith M, Beazley M, Progressive Regimes. Partnerships and the In Volvement of Local Communities: A Framework for Evaluation[J]. Pub lic Administration, 2000, (4): 855- 878.
  • 7Bentley T, McCarthy H, Mean M. Inside Out: RethinKing Inclusive Communities[M]. London: Demos/Bar POW Cadbury Trust, 2003.
  • 8Scottish Executive. A Power of Community Initiative: Community Planning: Political Restrictions on Council Employees [Z]. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive. 2000.
  • 9Rogers S, Smith M, Sullivan H, ClarKe M. Community Planning in Scotland: An Evaluation of the Path finder Projects[Z]. Edinburgh: CoSLA, 1999.
  • 10Audit Scotland. Community Planning: An Initial Review[Z]. Edinburgh: Audit Scotland. 2006.

共引文献618

同被引文献25

引证文献3

二级引证文献35

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部