期刊文献+

疾病获益感量表在缺血性脑卒中病人照顾者中的信效度检验 被引量:15

Reliability and validity test of the Benefit Finding Scale in caregivers of ischemic stroke patients
下载PDF
导出
摘要 [目的]检验疾病获益感量表在缺血性脑卒中病人照顾者中的信效度。[方法]采用照顾者一般资料调查表、疾病获益感量表对湖州市某三级甲等医院就诊的缺血性脑卒中照顾者160例进行调查。[结果]疾病获益感量表的Cronbach′sα系数为0.939,各维度的Cronbach′sα系数为0.813~0.976。量表的折半信度为0.869,各维度的折半信度为0.754~0.884。量表各个条目与其对应维度总分的相关系数为0.526~0.982,5个维度之间的相关系数为0.335~0.774,各维度与总分的相关系数为0.673~0.890。探索性因子分析提取4个公因子,累积方差贡献率为69.72%。[结论]疾病获益感量表具有良好的信效度,适合用来评估缺血性脑卒中主要照顾者的疾病获益感情况。 Objective:To test the reliability and validity of Benefit Finding Scale in caregivers of ischemic stroke patients.Methods:A survey,involving 160 caregivers of ischemic stroke patients in a tertiary grade A hospital in Huzhou city,was conducted by using the general information questionnaire of caregivers and Benefit Finding Scale.Results:The Cronbach′sαcoefficient of Benefit Finding Scale was 0.939.And the Cronbach′sαcoefficient of each dimension ranged from 0.813 to 0.976.The split‑half reliability of scale was 0.869.And the split‑half reliability of each dimension ranged from 0.754 to 0.884.The correlation coefficients between score of every item and total score of its corresponding dimension ranged from 0.526 to 0.982.The correlation coefficients of 5 dimension ranged from 0.335 to 0.774.And the correlation coefficients between score of every dimension and total score of scale ranged from 0.673 to 0.890.Based on exploratory factor analysis,four common factors were extracted.The cumulative contribution rate was 69.72%.Conclusion:The Benefit Finding Scale has good reliability and validity,which is suitable for evaluating the disease benefit finding in main caregivers of ischemic stroke patients.
作者 王如婷 章亚平 吕小英 吴丹 吴觅之 WANG Ruting;ZHANG Yaping;LYU Xiaoying;WU Dan;WU Mizhi(School of Nursing,Huzhou University,Zhejiang 313000 China)
出处 《护理研究》 北大核心 2020年第15期2655-2659,共5页 Chinese Nursing Research
基金 浙江省医药卫生科技计划项目,编号:2015KYA212。
关键词 缺血性脑卒中 照顾者 获益感 量表研究 信度 效度 ischemic stroke caregiver benefit finding scale study reliability validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献58

  • 1杨晓莉,吕海燕,李曙光.医生和护士对医护合作所持态度的对比研究[J].中华护理杂志,2006,41(5):466-469. 被引量:125
  • 2各类脑血管疾病诊断要点[J].中华神经科杂志,1996,29(6):379-380. 被引量:33029
  • 3尹祚芊 林小玲 冯容庄 等.个案管理师与医师临床实务合作之分析.荣总护理,2002,19(2):113-124.
  • 4戴维S穆尔.统计学的世界[M].北京:中信出版社,2003:96.
  • 5冯士雍.抽样调查理论与方法[M].北京:中国统计出版社,1999:24.
  • 6薛薇.SPSS统计分析方法及应用[M].北京:电子工业出版社,2010:234-293.
  • 7Tedeschi R G, Calhoun L G. The Posttraumatic Growth Invento- ry: Measuring the Positive Legacy of trauma :J:. Journal of Trau- matic Stress,1996,9(3) :455-471.
  • 8Gillen G. Positive consequences of surviving a stroke [J]. American Journal of Occupational Therapy,2005,59(3) :346 350.
  • 9Seale G S, Berges I M, Ottenbacher K J ,et al. Change in positive e- motion and recovery of functional status following stroke[J]. Reha h litation Psychology, 20 i0,5 ( 1), , 3 - 39.
  • 10Powell T, Ekin Wood A, Collin C. Post-traumatic growth after head injury: a long- term follow- up[J]. Brain Injury, 2007, 21 (i):31 38.

共引文献773

同被引文献202

引证文献15

二级引证文献34

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部