摘要
围绕第四轮学科评估结果,文章根据各省份获得A类情况、江苏省各城市上榜情况、"双一流"高校与非"双一流"高校获得A类情况作了深度分析,认为应结合理论与现实,辩证看待学科评估结果,既要看到它对于学科"以评促建"的功效,也要合理抵制一味地"唯分数论""唯排名论"等倾向。
The paper made an in-depth analysis and study on the results of the fourth round of discipline ranking,specifically,the distribution of A-class universities in each province,the distribution of cities on the A/B/C-class universities list in Jiangsu Province,and the distribution of A-class universities between "double first-class" universities and "non-double-class" universities.Combining the theory with reality,we should be dialectical to look at the results of the discipline evaluation.We must not only see its effectiveness in promoting the construction of disciplines,but also rationally resist the practice of focusing only on scores or rankings.
作者
袁燕
张广明
Yuan Yan;Zhang Guangming(Graduate School,Nanjing Tech University,Nanjing,Jiangsu 211800)
出处
《化工高等教育》
2020年第3期48-53,共6页
Higher Education in Chemical Engineering
基金
2019年校研究生教育教学改革课题“基于ESI的‘双一流’建设学科竞争力分析”(编号:YJG201919)
2019年校“协同创新”专项研究课题“基于学科排名体系分析的协同创新促进‘双一流’高校建设研究”(编号:XT201906)
2019年校党建与思想政治教育研究课题“国内外学科评估指标体系的对比分析研究”(编号:SZ20190416)。
关键词
第四轮学科评估
A类学科
“双一流”高校
The fourth round of discipline ranking
A-class discipline
Double first-class university
