期刊文献+

The role of peptidase neurolysin in neuroprotection and neural repair after stroke 被引量:3

下载PDF
导出
摘要 Current experimental stroke research has evolved to focus on detailed understanding of the brain’s self-protective and restorative mechanisms,and harness this knowledge for development of new therapies.In this context,the role of peptidases and neuropeptides is of growing interest.In this focused review,peptidase neurolysin(Nln)and its extracellular peptide substrates are briefly discussed in relation to pathophysiology of ischemic stroke.Upregulation of Nln following stroke is viewed as a compensatory cerebroprotective mechanism in the acute phase of stroke,because the main neuropeptides inactivated by Nln are neuro/cerebrotoxic(bradykinin,substance P,neurotensin,angiotensin II,hemopressin),whereas the peptides generated by Nln are neuro/cerebroprotective(angiotensin-(1–7),Leu-/Met-enkephalins).This notion is confirmed by experimental studies documenting aggravation of stroke outcomes in mice after inhibition of Nln following stroke,and dramatic improvement of stroke outcomes in mice overexpressing Nln in the brain.The role of Nln in the(sub)chronic phase of stroke is less clear and it is likely,that this peptidase does not have a major role in neural repair mechanisms.This is because,the substrates of Nln are less uniform in modulating neurorestorative mechanisms in one direction,some appearing to have neural repair enhancing/stimulating potential,whereas others doing the opposite.Future studies focusing on the role of Nln in pathophysiology of stroke should determine its potential as a cerebroprotective target for stroke therapy,because its unique ability to modulate multiple neuropeptide systems critically involved in brain injury mechanisms is likely advantageous over modulation of one pathogenic pathway for stroke pharmacotherapy.
出处 《Neural Regeneration Research》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2021年第1期21-25,共5页 中国神经再生研究(英文版)
基金 This work was partly supported by research grants from the American Heart Association(14BGIA20380826) National Institutes of Health(1R01NS106879).
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献184

  • 1江刚,舒斯云,包新民,常铉.大鼠纹状体边缘区与海马逃避性学习记忆功能的比较(英文)[J].中国临床康复,2005,9(32):254-256. 被引量:2
  • 2Glass HC, Ferriero DM. Treatment of hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy in newborns. Curr Treat Options Neural. 2007;9:414-423.
  • 3Gonzalez FF, Ferriero DM. Therapeutics for neonatal brain injury. Pharmacol Ther. 2008; 120:43-53.
  • 4Fan X, Kavelaars A, Heijnen CJ, et al. Pharmacological neuroprotection after perinatal hypoxic-ischemic brain injury. Curr Neuropharmacol. 2010;8:324-334.
  • 5Hamrick SE, Ferriero DM. The injury response in the term newborn brain. can we neuroprotect? Curr Opin Neurol. 2003;16:147-154.
  • 6Gill MB, Perez-Polo Jr. Hypoxia ischemia-mediated cell death in neonatal rat brain. Neurochem Res. 2008;33: 2379-2389.
  • 7Torfs CP, van den Berg B, Oechsli FW, et al. Prenatal and perinatal factors in the etiology of cerebral palsy. J Pediatr. 1990;116:615-619.
  • 8Carli G, Reiger I, Evans N. One-year neurodevelopmental outcome after moderate newborn hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy. J Paediatr Child Health. 2004;40: 217-220.
  • 9du Plessis A, Volpe JJ. Perinatal brain injury in the preterm and term newborn. Curr Opin Neurol. 2002;15:151-157.
  • 10Berger R, Garnier Y. Perinatal brain injury. J Perinat Med. 2000;28:261-285.

共引文献74

同被引文献16

引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部