摘要
学术成果影响力评价是科技管理工作的重要组成部分。由于评价机制不同,量化指标和同行评议之间存在巨大差异。本文以临床医学学科文献为例,通过论文F1000指标、被引频次和期刊影响因子的对比,对学术成果影响力的主要评价标准进行比较研究,为科研人员掌握本学科领域的最新研究进展和发展趋势,提升学术成果影响力提供决策参考。
The impact evaluation of academic achievements is an important part of scientific and technological management.Because of different evaluation mechanisms,there are huge differences between quantitative indicators and peer review.Taking the documents of clinical medicine as an example,this paper makes a comparative study on the main evaluation criteria of academic achievements by comparing the F1000 Index,Citation Frequency and Journal Influencing Factors,so as to provide decision-making reference for scientific researchers to master the latest research progress and development trend and enhance the influence of academic achievements.
作者
李莉琼
LI Li-qiong(China Three Gorges University,Yichang 443002,China)
出处
《价值工程》
2020年第24期208-210,共3页
Value Engineering
关键词
F1000
学术成果影响力
同行评议
量化指标
F1000
the impact of academic achievements
peer review
quantitative indicators