期刊文献+

基于结构-过程-结果理论的项目负责人科研信用评价体系研究 被引量:4

Research on Credit Evaluation System of the Project Leaders’ Scientifi c Research Basedon Structure-Process-Outcome Theory
下载PDF
导出
摘要 鉴于项目负责人在科研活动中的主体作用,以项目负责人为评价对象,基于乌鲁木齐、重庆和广东的科研信用评价实践,借助结构-过程-结果(SPO)理论,从科研能力、科研过程与科研结果三方面构建项目负责人信用评价指标,重点考察项目负责人在科研活动中所发表的论文数量和质量,在科研过程中是否存在弄虚作假及违法行为,以及对于科研结果的评价是否公正合理等。利用德尔菲法确立评价权重,提出评价项目负责人科研信用的五级标准,为科技管理部门加强科研诚信管理提供参考。 In view of the main role of the project leaders in scientific research activities,taking the project leaders as the research object,based on the practice of scientific research credit evaluation in Urumqi,Chongqing and Guangdong,this paper builds the project leaders credit evaluation from the three aspects of scientific research capabilities,scientific research process and scientific research results with the help of structure-process-outcome(SPO) theory indicators,which mainly focus on examining the quantity and quality of papers published by the project leaders in scientific research activities,whether there are frauds and illegal acts in the course of scientific research,and whether the evaluation of scientific research results is fair and reasonable.By using the Delphi method to establish evaluation weights,the paper puts forward five levels of research credit standards aiming at evaluating project leaders,in order to provide a reference for the scientific and technological management department to strengthen scientific research integrity management.
作者 叶小刚 YE Xiao-gang(Guangdong Science and Technology Innovation Monitoring and Research Center,Guangzhou 510033,China)
出处 《科技创新发展战略研究》 2020年第4期53-58,共6页 Strategy for Innovation and Development of Science and Technology
基金 广东省科技厅科技计划公益研究与能力建设专项项目“广东省科技业务管理阳光政务平台2.0建设及2017年度运维”(2017B080806001),“广东省科技咨询专家信用管理制度研究和应用”(2017A080805002)。
关键词 项目负责人 结构-过程-结果(SPO) 科研信用 评价 project leaders SPO theory research credit evaluation
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献47

共引文献106

同被引文献22

引证文献4

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部