期刊文献+

CYP2C19基因多态性对冠心病患者血栓弹力图参数及治疗效果的影响

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 探讨CYP2C19基因多态性对冠心病患者血栓弹力图及治疗效果的影响.方法 选取2017年10月~2019年3月行经皮冠状动脉介入术(PCI)的患者98例,对其进行CYP2C19基因型检测.依据CYP2C19基因检测结果,将患者分为快代谢组、中等代谢组和慢代谢组.用血栓弹力图测定各组血小板抑制率,以及MA-ADP值,随访6个月记录患者的主要心脏不良事件(MACE)发生情况.结果 在98例患者中,快代谢基因型38例(38.78%),中等代谢基因型47例(47.96%),慢代谢基因型13例(13.27%).快代谢型、中等代谢型以及慢代谢型血小板抑制率分别为(69.24±18.48)%、(53.66±16.64)% 和(32.57±17.29)%.其中快代谢基因型与中等代谢基因型比较无统计学差异(P>0.05),与慢代谢基因型比较,差异存在统计学意义(P<0.05).A组血栓弹力图MA-ADP值>47mm的发生率为71.05%,B组为74.47%,C组为69.23%,经统计分析比较,三组MA-ADP>47 mm的发生率差异无统计学意义(χ2=2.347,P>0.05).随访研究表明,慢代谢组MACE事件发生率高于快代谢组和中等代谢组,且存在统计学差异(P<0.05).结论 携带CYP2C19慢代谢基因型的患者常规应用氯吡格雷抗血小板治疗效果并不理想,CYP2C19基因监测对冠心病患者PCI术后精准治疗有一定的指导价值.
出处 《中国处方药》 2020年第8期165-166,共2页 Journal of China Prescription Drug
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献61

  • 1周健,吕虹,康熙雄.中国汉族人群不同性别、年龄、体重指数之间细胞色素氧化酶CYP2C19基因多态性的检测[J].中国临床药理学与治疗学,2007,12(2):208-213. 被引量:84
  • 2Jonas DE, Wines R. Pharmacogenomic testing and the prospect of individualized treatment. N C Med J, 2013, 74:485-493.
  • 3Melloni C, Jones WS, Washam JB, et al. Antiplatelet and Anticoagulant Treatments for Unstable Angina/Non-ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction [Internet]. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US), 2013 Nov.
  • 4Damman P, Varenhorst C, Koul S, et al. Treatment Patterns and Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Treated With Prasugre! or Clopidogrel (from the Swedish Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty Registry [SCAAR]), Am J Cardiol, 2014, 113:64-69.
  • 5Angiolillo D J, Ferreiro JL, Price M J, et al. Platelet function and genetic testing. J Am Coil Cardiol, 2013, 62:$21-$31.
  • 6Bonello L, Camoin-Jau L, Arques S, et al. Adjusted clopidogrel loading doses according to vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein phosphorylation index decrease rate of major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with clopidogrel resistance: a multicenter randomized prospective study. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2008, 51:1404- 1411.
  • 7Valgimigli M, Campo G, de Cesare N, et al. Intensifying platelet inhibition with tirofiban in poor responders to aspirin, clopidogrel, or both agents undergoing elective coronary intervention: results from the double-blind, prospective, randomized Tailoring Treatment with Tirofiban in Patients Showing Resistance to Aspirin and/or Resistance to Clopidogrel study. Circulation, 2009, 119:3215-3222.
  • 8Levine GN, Bates ER, Blankenship JC, et al. 2011 ACCF/AHA/ SCAI Guideline for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions. J Am Coil Cardiol, 2011, 58:e44-e122.
  • 9Wright RS, Anderson JL, Adams CD, et al. 2011 ACCF/AHA Focused Update of the Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina/Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (Updating the 2007 Guideline): a report of the American College ofCardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation, 2011, 123:2022-2060.
  • 10Hamm CW, Bassand JP, Agewall S, et al. ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: The Task Force for the management of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J, 2011, 32:2999-3054.

共引文献73

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部