期刊文献+

动物实验报告规范——ARRIVE 2019简介 被引量:3

The reporting guideline of animal studies—ARRIVE 2019
原文传递
导出
摘要 作为提高动物实验报告质量的工具,ARRIVE指南自2010年发布以来得到了众多专家学者的认可。限于ARRIVE 2010部分条目过于繁琐,导致研究人员在其实际应用中遇到诸多困难。为此,指南制定专家重新对ARRIVE指南进行修订,即ARRIVE 2019。本文对ARRIVE 2019进行详细介绍,以便于国内研究人员充分利用ARRIVE指南改进动物实验的设计、实施与报告规范,提高动物实验的可重复性和结果的再现性。 As a tool to improve the reporting quality of animal studies,ARRIVE guidelines have been recognized by many experts.However,limited to partial items are too tedious and the reasons for the lack of clear priorities for each item,it leads to barriers while the researchers try to use it in practice.Therefore,guide development experts re-revised the ARRIVE guide and published ARRIVE 2019.In this paper,ARRIVE 2019 was interpreted in detail in order to make full use of ARRIVE guidelines to improve the design,implementation and reporting of animal studies,and to improve the reproducibility of animal studies and the reproducibility of results.
作者 尚志忠 姜彦彪 赵冰 张哲文 赵霏 张婷 张俊华 马彬 Zhi-Zhong SHANG;Yan-Biao JIANG;Bing ZHAO;Zhe-Wen ZHANG;Fei ZHAO;Ting ZHANG;Jun-Hua ZHANG;Bin MA(Evidence-Based Medicine Center,Lanzhou University,Lanzhou 730000,China;School of Basic Medical Sciences,Lanzhou University,Lanzhou 730000,China;The Second Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University,Lanzhou 730000,China;Experimental Teaching Center,School of Basic Medical Sciences,Lanzhou University,Lanzhou 730000,China;Department of Functional Studies,School of Medicine,Northwestern University for Nationalities,Lanzhou 730030,China;Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Tianjin 301617,China;Key Laboratory of Evidence-Based Medicine and Knowledge Translation of Gansu Province,Lanzhou 730000,China)
出处 《医学新知》 CAS 2020年第4期285-290,共6页 New Medicine
基金 国家自然科学基金(81873184) 兰州大学中央高校基本科研项目(lzujbky-2018-98)。
关键词 动物实验 报告规范 ARRIVE指南 Animal studies Reporting specification ARRIVE guidelines
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献20

  • 1熊玮,魏强,刘雪梅.动物实验研究的系统评价简介[J].中国循证医学杂志,2005,5(2):161-163. 被引量:11
  • 2Alternatives to animal use in research, testing, and education: summary. End. 22. United States. Congress. Office of Technology Assessment, 1986.
  • 3Roberts I, Kwan I, Evans P, et al. Does animal experimentation inform human healthcare? Observations from a systematic review of international animal experiments on fluid resuscitation. BMJ, 2002, 324(7335): 474-476.
  • 4Festing MF. The scope for improving the design of laboratory animal experiments. Lab Anita, 1992, 26(4): 256-268.
  • 5Festing MF. The design and statistical analysis of animal experiments. ILAR J, 2002, 43(4): 191-193.
  • 6Macleod MR, Ebrahim S, Roberts I. Surveying the literature from animal experiments: systematic review and meta-analysis are important contributions. BMJ, 2005, 331 (7508): 110.
  • 7Macleod MR, O'Collins T, Horky LL, et al. Systematic review and meta analysis of the efficacy of FK506 in experimental stroke. 1 Cereb Blood Flow Metab, 2005, 25(6): 713-721.
  • 8Kilkenny C, Parsons N, Kadyszewski E, et al. Survey of the Quality of Experimental Design, Statistical Analysis and Reporting of Research Using Animals. PLoS ONE, 2009, 4(11): e7824.
  • 9Hooijmans C, de Vries R, Leenaars M, et al. The Gold Standard Publication Checklist (GSPC) for improved design, reporting and scientific quality of animal studies GSPC versus ARRIVE guidelines. LabAnim, 2011, 45(1): 61.
  • 10Mcgrath JC, Drummond GB, Mclachlan EM, et al. Guidelines for reporting experiments involving animals: the ARRIVE guidelines.BrJ Pharmacol, 2010, 160(7): 1573-1576.

共引文献9

同被引文献27

引证文献3

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部