期刊文献+

理学视域中的礼说——程颐论郊祀宗祀与宗子法 被引量:3

Discourse upon Rites in Neo-Confucianism——Cheng Yi’s Thought of Offering Sacrifices to Ancestors and Relationship between Benevolence and Filial Piety
下载PDF
导出
摘要 程颐对郊祀宗祀的理解简洁明快,体现出了理学疑经惑传的特点。他对宗祀制的理解,一方面强调父子之亲,另一方面严守君臣之义,这一做法正与他对濮议的看法完全一致,而其协调父子、君臣二伦的办法即是立足于天理本体,超越忠、孝孰轻孰重的二元对立困境。他以郊祀为合食之祭,从而突出了祭始祖与宗子法的必要性与合理性。以祭祀为天性,从理论上说明礼乐之公共性,更是极大地彰显了祭祀之礼的普遍性,为宋代以降之庶民礼制提供了理论依据,其最重要的意义则指向儒家公天下的一体政治理想之实现。 Cheng Yi’s understanding about offering sacrifice at suburb and lighting temple was succinct,and manifested the characteristic of being suspicious of Confucian classics.As for sacrifice at lighting temple,he emphasized both of the relation between father and son,emperor and subject,this idea is the same as his understanding of“pu yi”,by so doing,he avoided the conflict of the two relations,what made him do this is that he considered heavenly principle as the basic of them.As for sacrifice at suburb,he mingled this with offering sacrifice to all ancestors,so as to show the importance of sacrifice to the earliest ancestor and reconstruction of patriarchal clan system.Regarding offering sacrificing as human nature,he highlighted the universality and commonality of rites very much,in the greatest sense,the meaning of Cheng Yi’s thought about rites is trying to realize the Confucian ideal of the whole world as one community.
作者 刘增光 Liu Zengguang(Renmin University of China,School of Philosophy,Beijing 100872)
出处 《黑龙江社会科学》 2020年第4期1-8,159,共9页 Social Sciences in Heilongjiang
关键词 礼制 郊祀 宗祀 宗子法 程颐 天理 Rites Sacrifice at Suburb Patriarchal Clan System Cheng Yi Heavenly Principle
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献4

  • 1方光华.论孔孟的仁义与天道[J].湘潭大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2005,29(5):89-93. 被引量:2
  • 2程光裕.《北宋台谏之争与濮议》,宋史座谈会《宋史研究集(第二辑)》,台北:“国立”编译馆中华丛书编审委员会,1983年,第213页.
  • 3《中庸》第20章,《四书章句集注》,北京:中华书局,1983年,第28页.
  • 4丁成际.荀子礼之功能论[J].安徽大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2009,33(4):16-20. 被引量:3

共引文献20

同被引文献96

引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部