摘要
自《中国(浙江)自由贸易试验区总体方案》实施以来,在新的制度供给驱动下,舟山保税燃料油供应规模快速增长。但与新加坡、香港等地比较依然存在价格劣势,为了在价格竞争中确立优势,降低成本就成为产业发展的必然行动逻辑。本文比较了新加坡、香港及舟山三地保税燃料油供应成本,分析了具体差异,提出了降低税费成本、制度交易成本、金融成本、用工成本、用能成本、物流成本的具体对策措施。
China(zhejiang)pilot free trade zone since the implementation of the overall program,In the new system supply,driven by rapid growth of zhoushan bonded fuel oil supply scale compared with Hong Kong,Singapore and other places are still exist price disadvantage,in order to establish the advantage in price competition,cost reduction will become necessary in industrial action logic research compared the bonded fuel oil supply cost,Singapore,Hong Kong and zhoushan,Hong Kong and analyses the concrete differences,put forward to reduce tax cost,transaction cost financial cost labor costs in the cost of logistics cost of the specific countermeasures.
作者
庄韶辉
胡佳
汪凌云
陈晟
顾自刚
ZHUANG Shao-hui;HU Jia;WANG Ling-yun;CHEN Sheng;GU Zi-gang(Zhoushan Municipal Party School,316000,Zhoushan,Zhejiang,China)
出处
《特区经济》
2020年第7期151-153,共3页
Special Zone Economy
基金
浙江省党校(行政学院)系统中国特色社会主义理论体系研究中心第二十批规划课题“舟山保税燃料油供应产业成本降低策略研究——基于新加坡、香港、舟山三地的比较分析”(课题编号:ZX20253)。
关键词
保税燃料油
供应成本
比较
对策
bonded fuel oil
Cost of supply
Comparison
countermeasures