机器人写作的版权争议与辨析

Robot Writing’s Copyright Dispute and Discrimination

本文从作品界定、著作权归属主体和版权保护三方面分析了机器人写作目前所存在的争议,与《著作权法》的具体条例相对应进行了辨析。现行版权法并无机器人写作的相关条例规定,无法直接明确机器人写作的产物是否为作品。通过对独创性的分析,本文认定其创作中所体现出的独创性成分应支撑其创作物成为作品。根据已有的主体认定案例,经分析认为操作者最符合机器人创作归属主体的认定,在保护上参考职务作品的保护模式。而对于数据的侵权,应从技术的提升以及法律的具体认定来平衡现有资源的共享。

This research analyzed the current disputes of robot writing from the three aspects of defining copyright owner and copyright protection,and differentiated them from the specific regulations of the copyright law.There was no relevant regulation of robot writing in the current copyright law,so it is not directly clear whether the product of robot writing is a work.Through the analysis of originality,this research concluded that the originality elements reflected in his creation should support his creation to become a work.According to the existing subject identification,the analysis showed that the operator is the most consistent with the identification of the subject of robot creation,and the protection mode referred to official works.As for the data infringement,we should balance the sharing of existing resources with the improvement of technology and the specific identification of law.