期刊文献+

孕期全程营养管理对孕期并发症和妊娠结局的影响 被引量:8

Effects of Pregnant Nutrition Management on Pregnancy Complications and Pregnancy Outcome
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:评价孕期全程营养管理对孕期营养相关并发症和妊娠结局的影响。方法:选取北京清华长庚医院产科建档的单胎妊娠妇女,营养干预组为预产期2019年2—5月产科建档孕妇,选取2018年同月份生产孕妇作为历史对照组。收集研究对象的基本信息,制定孕期全程营养管理流程,干预组孕妇在产科随访的基础上,分别在孕早期(8周前)、孕中期(12周)、孕晚期(28周)接受孕期营养随访共3次。历史对照组接受产科常规管理。全程监测和记录两组孕妇孕期增重,出现胎儿生长受限(IUGR)、妊娠高血压、妊娠糖尿病(GDM)等并发症的发生率,以及分娩方式、胎儿体重的情况。结果:营养干预组孕妇GDM的发病率为10.8%,低于历史对照组的22.9%(P<0.01);孕28周贫血率为19.7%,明显低于历史对照组的30.2%(P<0.05);干预组孕期增重(14.4±3.5)kg,明显低于对照组的(17.1±4.4)kg(P<0.05)。干预组孕妇剖宫产的比例为36.1%,虽低于对照组的38.1%,但未见显著性(P=0.529)。干预组和对照组孕妇胎儿生长受限、妊娠高血压的发生率对比分别为0 vs 0.7%、3.3%vs 5.2%(P>0.05),两组胎儿为低体重儿的比例为3.8%vs 3.2%,胎儿巨大儿比例为4.9%vs 5.9%(P均>0.05)。结论:孕期全程营养管理可以明显降低妊娠糖尿病和孕期贫血的发病率,有利于控制孕期增重,而胎儿生长受限、妊娠高血压和巨大儿的比例虽然有下降趋势,但差异未见统计学意义,可能需要更多临床研究数据的支持。 [Objective]To evaluate the effect of nutrition management during pregnancy on nutrition-related complications and pregnancy outcome.[Method]Singleton pregnant women from antenatal care department in Beijing Tsinghua Changgung hospital were selected.The nutrition management group was pregnant women with the due date from February to May 2019,and pregnant women with the due date in the same month of 2018 were selected as the historical control group.The basic information of all objects was collected.Women in intervention group received nutritional intervention by nutritionist for three times based on antenatal examination,respectively in the first trimester(8 th week),midtrimester(12 th week),last trimester(28 th week).The historical control group received routine prenatal care from obstetrics department.Besides gestational weight gain(GWG),the incidence of intrauterine growth retardation(IUGR),gestational hypertension,gestational diabetes mellitus(GDM)and other complications of pregnant women in both groups were monitored and recorded during the whole process,as well as the delivery mode and fetal weight.[Result]The incidence of GDM in nutritional intervention group was 10.8%,lower than that in historical control group(22.9%,P<0.01).The rate of anemia at 28 th week was 19.7%,which was significantly lower than that of control group(30.2%,P<0.05).The nutritional intervention also increased GWG to(14.4±3.5)kg,which was significantly lower than that of of control group[(17.1±4.4)kg,P<0.05].The proportion of caesarean section in pregnant women in the intervention group was 36.1%,lower than that in the control group(38.1%),but no significant difference was observed(P=0.529).The incidence of IGFR,gestational hypertension in intervention group and control group were respectively 0 vs 0.7%,3.3%vs 5.2%(P>0.05),the ratio of low birth weight of fetus was 3.8%vs 3.2%,ratio of macrosomia was 4.9%vs 5.9%,but the difference of birth weight was not significant by chi-square test(P>0.05).[Conclusion]Nutrition management during pregnancy could significantly reduce the incidence of GDM,anemia and decrease GWG.While the proportion of IUGR,gestational hypertension and macrosomia had a decreasing trend,but the difference was not significant,which may need more clinical data to verify.
作者 金超 杨勤兵 李世阳 张欣悦 林兵 JIN Chao;YANG Qin-bing;LI Shi-yang;ZHANG Xin-yue;LIN Bing(Department of Clinical Nutrition,Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital,Tsinghua University,Beijing 102218,China)
出处 《中国食物与营养》 2020年第7期72-76,共5页 Food and Nutrition in China
基金 北京清华长庚医院研究基金(项目编号:12019C1003)。
关键词 孕期营养管理 营养干预 孕期并发症 妊娠结局 nutrition management during pregnancy nutritional intervention pregnancy complication pregnancy outcome
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献40

  • 1刘冬英,王林静,王秀霞,钟淑婷,宁艳辉.广州市孕妇营养知识、态度及饮食行为调查[J].现代预防医学,2007,34(14):2683-2685. 被引量:31
  • 2Lau C, Rogers JM, Dcs:-li M, et al. Fetal programming of adult dis- ease: implications for prenatal care [ J ]. Obstct Gynecol, 2011, 117 (4) : 978-985.
  • 3Bartz S, Freemark M. Pathogenesis and prevention of type 2 diabetes: parental determinants, breastfeeding, and early childhood nutrition [J]. CurrDiabRep, 2012, 12 (1): 82-87.
  • 4Chen H, Nembhard WN, Stockwell ttG. Sex- specific eifeets of fetal exposure to tile 1959-1961 Chilmse famine on risk of adult hyperten- sion [ J]. Matern Child Health J,2014,18 ( 3 ) : 527-533.
  • 5Remaele C, Bieswal F, Bol V, et al. Developmental programming of a- dult obesity and cardiovascular disease in rodents by maternal nutrition imbalance[ J]. Am J CIin Nutr,2011,94(6) : 1846S-1852S.
  • 6Coustan DR. Gestational diabetes mellitus [ J ]. Clin Chem, 2013,59 (9) :1310-1321.
  • 7Tsai IH, Chen CP, Sun FJ, et al. Associations of the prepregnancy body mass index and gestational weight gain with pregnancy outcomes in Taiwan Residents women [ J ]. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr, 2012,21 ( 1 ) :82-87.
  • 8Kinnunen TI, et al. Preventing excessive gestational weight gain-a secondary analysis of a cluster-randomised controlled trial [J]. Eur J Clin Nutr, 2012,66(12) :1344-1350.
  • 9Park S, et al. Gestational diabetes is associated with high energy and saturated fat intakes and with low plasma visfatin and adiponectin levels independent of prepregnancy BMI [J]. Eur J Clin Nutr, 2013,67 (2) : 196-201.
  • 10Gutaj P, Wender-Ozegowska E, Mantaj U, et al. Maternal body mass index and gestational weight gain and their association with perinatal outcome in women with gestational diabetes [J]. Ginekol Pol, 2011,82( 11 ) :827-833.

共引文献142

同被引文献95

引证文献8

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部