期刊文献+

霫与白霫及霫与奚有关问题考辨

Study on the Relationship of the Ethnic Groups of Xi(霫),Baixi(白霫)and Xi(奚)
下载PDF
导出
摘要 对于霫与白霫的关系,学术界有同族说、异族说、同源异流说,可是从地域、风俗、都城等方面进行探讨,发现霫与白霫高度吻合,可以得出二者为同一民族的结论。至于霫与奚的关系,则普遍被认为是两个民族,通过分析相关事例,发现霫与奚并非两个民族,而是一个民族的两种写法,属于古代的通假字现象。因此,霫、白霫、奚其实就是一个民族。 There are views of one people,different peoples or one origin but different branches about the relationship between the ethnic groups of Xi(霫)and Baixi(白霫)in the academic circles.But from the analysis on the aspects such as the region,custom and capital,it comes to the conclusion that Xi(霫)and Baixi(白霫)are one people.As for the relationship between Xi(霫)and Xi(奚),it is widely regarded to be two different ethnic groups.However,through the analysis of relevant cases,it is found that Xi(霫)and Xi(奚)are two different written forms for one people,which is a phenomenon of the interchangeability of ancient Chinese characters.Therefore,it is concluded that Xi(霫),Baixi(白霫)and Xi(奚)are one people.
作者 马德全 MA Dequan(Marxism College of Inner Mongolia University for the Nationalities, Tongliao, Inner Mongolia,China 028043)
出处 《内蒙古师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 2020年第4期36-40,共5页 Journal of Inner Mongolia Normal University:Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition
基金 国家社科基金一般项目“辽夏金元对西部边疆的治理与国家安全研究”(16XZS011)的研究成果之一。
关键词 白霫 关系 Xi(霫) Baixi(白霫) Xi(奚) relationship
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献36

  • 1冯继钦.霫与白霫新探[J].社会科学辑刊,1995(3):91-97. 被引量:3
  • 2[4]隋书[M].北京:中华书局,1973.
  • 3[2]金毓黻.东北通史:上编6卷[M].北京:五十年代出版社,1981.
  • 4[5]唐会要:卷99[M].北京:中华书局,1995.
  • 5[6]孙进己,冯永谦.东北历史地理:第2卷[M].哈尔滨:黑龙江人民出版社,1989.
  • 6[8]岑仲勉.突厥史集:下册[M].北京:中华书局,1958.
  • 7.《辞海》[M].,1979年版..
  • 8.《辽史》[M].,..
  • 9.《金史》[M].,..
  • 10.《宋史》[M].,..

共引文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部