期刊文献+

乳腺癌21基因检测的研究进展 被引量:3

Research progress of 21-genes in breast cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 乳腺癌是一类具有异质性的肿瘤,不同患者的治疗方法和疗效都不相同。尽管目前仍在努力为激素受体(hormone receptor,HR)阳性(+)、人表皮生长因子受体2(human epidermal growth factor receptor 2,HER-2)阴性(-)、淋巴结(axillary lymph node,ALN)阴性(-)的早期乳腺癌患者寻找合适的治疗方法,但其术后是否需要化疗仍然是肿瘤科医生面临的一个难题。以往治疗主要依赖于经典的组织病理学和免疫组织化学技术,随着精准医疗时代的到来,我们需要更定量的诊断方法和合理的个体化治疗。虽然化疗可降低疾病复发风险并提高生存率,但它带来的不良反应事件会降低患者的生活质量,尤其低复发风险(recurrence risk,RS)有可能超过化疗益处。21基因检测不仅可以预测这类早期乳腺癌化疗疗效及评估预后,还可提供精准的个体化治疗方案指导用药,为患者增添信心。本文就乳腺癌21基因检测的研究进展进行综述。 Breast cancer is a heterogeneous type of tumor,and different patients have different treatment methods and curative effects.Although efforts are still being made to find appropriate treatments for patients with early stage breast cancer who are hormone receptor(HR)positive(+),human epidermal growth factor receptor 2(HER-2)negative(-)and axillary lymph node(ALN)negative(-),but the need for chemotherapy after surgery remains a problem for oncologists.In the past,treatment still relied mainly on classic histopathology and immunohistochemistry.With the advent of the era of precision medicine,we need more quantitative diagnostic methods and reasonable individualized treatment.Although chemotherapy can reduce the risk of disease recurrence and improve survival,its adverse events(especially low RS)can reduce the quality of life of patients and may exceed the benefits of chemotherapy.The 21-gene assay can not only predict the efficacy and prognosis of chemotherapy,but also provide individualized treatment schemes to increase patient confidence.This article reviews the research progress of 21-gene assay.
作者 吴洋 宋燕妮 Wu Yang;Song Yanni(Department of Breast Surgical,Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital,Heilongjiang Harbin 150081,China)
出处 《现代肿瘤医学》 CAS 2020年第18期3255-3259,共5页 Journal of Modern Oncology
基金 国家自然科学基金(编号:81302286/H1622) 中国博士后科学基金(编号:2016M590209) 哈医大附属肿瘤医院海燕科研基金(编号:JJZD2020-04)。
关键词 早期乳腺癌 化疗 21基因复发风险评分 研究进展 early breast cancer chemotherapy 21 gene recurrence risk score research progress
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献15

  • 1Budd GT, Barlow WE, Moore HCF, et al. SWOG S0221: A phase III trial comparing chemotherapy schedules in high-risk ear- ly-stage breast cancer[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2015, 33(1): 58-64.
  • 2Samuel JA, Wilson JW, Bandos H. NSABP B-36: a randomized phase III trial comparing six cycles of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FEC) to four cycles of adria- mycin and cyclophosphamide (AC) in patients (pts) with node-negative breast cancer [C]. San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium, 2014: S3-02.
  • 3Eiermann W, Pienkowski T, Crown J, et al. Phase III study of doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide with concomitant versus sequen- tial docetaxel as adjuvant treatment in patients with human epi- dermal growth factor receptor 2-normal, node-positive breast cancer: BCIRG-005 trial [J]. J Clin Oncol, 2011, 29(29): 3877-3884.
  • 4Davies C. Adjuvant Tamoxifen: Longer Against Shorter (ATLAS) Collaborative Group. Long-term effects of continuing adjuvant tamoxifen to 10 years versus stopping at 5 years after diagnosis of oestrogen receptor-positive breast cancer: ATLAS, a ran- domised trial [J]. Lancet, 2013, 381(9869): 804-804.
  • 5Jin H, Tu D, Zhao N, et al. Longer-term outcomes of letrozole versus placebo after 5 years of tamoxifen in the NCIC CTG MA. 17 trial: analyses: adjusting for treatment crossover [J]. J Clin Oncol, 2012, 30(7): 718-721.
  • 6Pagani O, Regan MM, Walley B, et al: Randomized comparison of adjuvant aromatase inhibitor (AI) exemestane (E) plus ovarian function suppression (OFS) vs tamoxifen (3") plus OFS in pre- menopausal women with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) early breast cancer (BC): Joint analysis of IBCSG TEXT and SOFT tri- als [C].ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings, 2014, 32(18 suppl): LBA 1.
  • 7Francis PA, Regan MM, Fleming GF. Randomized comparison of adjuvant tamoxifen (T) plus ovarian function suppression (0FS) versus tamoxifen in premenopausal women with hormone recep- tor-positive (HR + ) early breast cancer (BC): analysis of the SOFT trial [C~. San Antnni9 Breast Cancer Symposium, 2014: $3-08.
  • 8Cuzick J, Sestak I, Baum M, et al. Effect of anastrozole and tamoxifen as adjuvant treatment for early-stage breast cancer: 10-year analysis of the ATAC trial [J]. Lancet Oncol, 2010, 11 (12): 1135-1141.
  • 9Regan MM, Neven P, Giobbie-Hurder A, et al. BIG 1-98 Col- laborative Group; International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBC- SG). Assessment of letrozole and tamoxifen alone and in se- quence for postmenopausal women with steroid hormone recep- tor-positive breast cancer: the BIG 1-98 randomised clinical tri- al at 8.1 years median follow-up [J]. Lancet Oncol, 2011, 12 (12): 1101-1108.
  • 10Di Leo A, Jerusalem G, Petruzelka L, et al. Final overall surviv- al: fulvestrant 500rag vs 250rag in the randomized CONFIRM trial[J]. J Nati Cancer Inst, 2014,106(1):djt 337.

共引文献51

同被引文献26

引证文献3

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部