摘要
《傲慢与偏见》开篇提到的"公认的真理"和反常的人物出场顺序同小说情节发展之间存在一种隐含关系。借鉴帕尔默的群体心智概念,从社会认知角度入手并结合文本细读的方法,可以发现,《傲慢与偏见》的开篇章节实际上建构了一种群体心智——"朗伯恩心智"。这为小说中达西的"傲慢"与伊丽莎白"偏见"的形成提供了认知环境。"达西是傲慢的"这一错误认识是由朗伯恩心智的主观臆断造成的,然后经过家人朋友有意无意的强调而被伊丽莎白所接受。伊丽莎白对达西的"偏见"也是在朗伯恩群体心智和个体心智等多种因素的共同作用下逐步形成的。小说的结局表明,只有摆脱朗伯恩心智的束缚,伊丽莎白才能认识真实的达西并获得幸福的爱情。
The "truth universally acknowledged" and the abnormal arrangement of main characters in A usten’s Pride and Prejudice exhibit an implicit relation with the following plot development. To explore this kind of relationship,Palmer’s "Middlemarch mind" was borrowed and close reading method was employed. A social cognitive analysis of Pride and Prejudice finds that a kind of group mind,the Longbourn mind,is constructed in the earlier chapters. The Longbourn mind provides a cognitive ecology for Darcy’s assumed pride and Elizabeth’s prejudice on Darcy. The wrong judgment that "Darcy is pride"is caused by the bind Longbourn Mind,and then accepted by Elizabeth under her family members and friends’ intentional or unintentional emphasis. Elizabeth’s prejudice on Darcy is also formed and reinforced by the Longbourn Mind and the Longbourn individuals. The happy ending of Pride and Prejudice shows that only by stepping out the Longbourn village and getting rid of the bondage of the Longbourn Mind can Elizabeth truely know what kind of person Darcy is and marry him.
出处
《广东外语外贸大学学报》
2020年第4期42-51,157,158,共12页
Journal of Guangdong University of Foreign Studies
基金
国家社会科学基金项目“社会认知视角下的简·奥斯丁作品研究”(14BWW041)。
