ICU护理风险干预在急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者中的应用效果分析

Analysis of the Effect of ICU Nursing Risk Intervention in Patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

目的探讨ICU护理风险干预在急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者中的应用效果。方法以2017年12月—2019年8月为研究时间段,随机选取该院在此期间接受治疗的急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者100例,依据患者接受护理方法的不同将其分为两组,每组50例。常规护理定义为对照组,采用ICU护理风险干预实施护理的定义为实验组。对比两组患者的临床护理效果。结果实验组实施ICU护理风险干预后,对照组护理质量评分分别为(19.18±1.36)分、(16.24±1.39)分、(18.35±1.41)分、(17.41±1.25)分;实验组护理质量评分分别为(21.56±1.21)分、(22.16±1.54)分、(21.25±1.34)分、(21.33±1.56)分,患者护理质量高于对照组(t=9.245、20.178、10.542、13.866,P=0.000、0.000、0.000、0.000)。对照组SAS、SDS评分分别为(48.61±2.12)、(49.33±1.36)分;实验组SAS、SDS评分分别为(37.25±2.14)分、(35.13±1.28)分;患者护理后的SAS、SDS评分相对于对照组明显的好转(t=26.666、53.763,P=0.000)。实验组患者94.00%(47/50)的护理满意度高于对照组78.00%(39/50),差异有统计学意义(χ^2=0.021,P<0.05、0.000)。结论在急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者护理中采用ICU护理风险干预,护理效果显著。

Objective To explore the effect of ICU nursing risk intervention in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome.Methods From December 2017 to August 2019 as the research period,100 patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome who were treated in the hospital during this period were random selected,and they were divided into 2 groups according to the different nursing methods of patients.Each group 50 cases each.Routine nursing was defined as the control group,and ICU nursing risk intervention was used as the experimental group.Compare the clinical nursing effects of the two groups of patients.Results After the ICU nursing risk intervention was implemented in the experimental group,the nursing quality scores of the control group were(19.18±1.36)points,(16.24±1.39)points,(18.35±1.41)points,(17.41±1.25)points;the nursing quality scores of the experimental group were(21.56±1.21)points,(22.16±1.54)points,(21.25±1.34)points,(21.33±1.56)points,the quality of patient care was higher than that of the control group(t=9.245,20.178,10.542,13.866,P=0.000,0.000,0.000,0.000).The SAS and SDS scores of the control group were(48.61±2.12)points and(49.33±1.36)points;the SAS and SDS scores of the experimental group were(37.25±2.14)points,(35.13±1.28)points;the SAS and SDS scores of the patients after care were relative to the control group,improved significantly(t=26.666,53.763,P=0.000,0.000).The satisfaction of nursing in 94.00%(47/50)of the patients in the experimental group was higher than that in the control group,78.00%(39/50),the difference was statistically significant(χ^2=5.316,P<0.05).Conclusion ICU nursing risk intervention is used in the nursing of patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome,and the nursing effect is significant.