期刊文献+

从美国丁香烟案看TBT国民待遇原则之应用规则 被引量:1

The Applicability of the TBT National Treatment Principle in the Case of American Clove Cigarette
原文传递
导出
摘要 国民待遇原则体现了当代国际贸易的公平精神,是WTO法律制度所规范的重要原则之一。其中,TBT协定第2.1条对该原则作出明确规定。然而,如何实现TBT协定中国民待遇原则的正确适用,人们对此问题的理解并不统一。为此,本文结合美国-印度尼西亚丁香烟争端案,对TBT国民待遇原则的适用规则进行了系统分析,特别是对同类产品和不低于待遇的认定方法标准进行了深入阐释,并对其优缺点进行评估,以期为WTO法律实践中国民待遇原则的准确理解和运用提供理论指导。 The principle of national treatment embodies the spirit of fairness in contemporary international trade,and it is one of the important principles regulated by the WTO legal system.Among them,article 2.1 of the TBT agreement makes a clear provision for this principle.However,the understanding of how to achieve the correct application of the principle of national treatment under the TBT agreement is not uniform.For this purpose,this paper makes a systematic analysis of the applicability rules of the principle of national treatment under the TBT agreement in the case of clove tobacco dispute between the United States and Indonesia,in particular the criteria for identification methods of like products and no less than treatment are deeply explained,and it also evaluates advantages and disadvantages of these criteria,in order to provide theoretical guidance for the accurate understanding and application of the principle of national treatment in WTO legal practice.
作者 张祖增 李建军 ZHANG Zu-Zeng;LI Jian-Jun(Law School of Nankai University,Tianjin 300350;WTO/SPS National Notification&Enquiry Center of P.R.C,Beijing 100013)
出处 《中国口岸科学技术》 2020年第7期25-30,共6页 China Port Science and Technology
基金 海关总署科研项目(2019HK154)资助。
关键词 国民待遇原则 TBT协定 美国丁香烟案 应用规则 principle of national treatment TBT agreement dispute of American clove cigarette applicability rules
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献113

  • 1John H.Jackson,World Trade And The Law of Gatt259(1968)..
  • 2Nicolas F.Diebold,Non-Discrimination in International Trade in Services:‘Likeness’in Wto/Gats,2010.
  • 3Won-Mog Chol,LikePiroducts In International Trade Law:Towards A Consistent Gatt/Wto Jurlsprudence,2003.
  • 4Robert E.Hudec,“Like Products”:The Difference in Meaning in Gatt Article I and III,in Regulatory Barriers And The Principle Of Non-Discrimination In Wwrld Trade Law101(ThomasCottier&Petros Mavroidis eds.,2000).
  • 5Robert E.Hudec,Gatt/Wto Constraints on National Regulation:Requiem for An‘Aim and Effect’Test[hereinafter Hudec,‘Aim and Effect’],32INT’L L.619(1998).
  • 6Gerald C.Berg,An Economics Interpretation of“Like Products”,30Journal Of World Trade195(1996).
  • 7Rex J.Zedalis,The Theory of GATT“Like”Product Common Language Cases,27Vander.J.Transnat’L L.33(1994).
  • 8Michael Trebilcock&Shiva K.Giri,The National Treatment Principle in International Trade Law,in HandbookOf International Trade(E.Kwan Choi&James C.Hartigan eds.,2005),Vol.2.*.
  • 9GATT第3条第1款.
  • 10John H.Jackson,TheJurisprudence of Gatt and The WTO:Insights On Treaty Law And Economic Relations129(2000)..

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部