期刊文献+

基于分层式证据推理的信息融合故障诊断方法 被引量:10

Information fusion-based fault diagnosis method via hierarchical evidence reasoning
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对基于信息融合的故障诊断方法中,诊断证据的精细化获取问题和在线诊断信息量受限问题,提出分层式的证据推理(ER)诊断方法.在诊断证据获取过程中,给出故障特征参考值投点方法,按比例求取特征样本点对相邻参考值的相似度,生成点值型参考证据矩阵(REM)和在线故障特征样本的诊断证据,实现了诊断信息的精细化提取;在证据融合过程中,设计分层式ER融合模型.第1层融合中利用k-NN算法找到在线样本的近邻历史样本,然后利用ER规则实现在线样本与近邻历史样本对应证据的融合.在第2层融合中,将多个特征源提供的第1层融合结果再次融合,并根据两层融合所获证据进行故障决策;此外,在分层融合模型中,根据证据之间的欧氏距离构造目标函数及相应的证据重要性权重优化方法.最后,在多功能电机转子试验台上实施了故障诊断实验,与已有单层ER模型诊断结果进行比较,说明所提方法通过提升诊断证据的精确性、增加历史样本扩充诊断信息量,能够有效提升确诊率. In the framework of information fusion,this paper presents a hierarchical evidence reasoning(ER)-based fusion method to deal with accurate acquirement problem of diagnosis evidence and the information limitation problem in online diagnosis.In the process of diagnosis evidence acquirement,the casting strategy using reference values of fault features is proposed to proportionally calculate the similarity degree between feature sample and its neighboring reference values.In this way,the reference evidence matrix(REM)with the form of point values can be obtained and then the accurate diagnosis evidence of online fault feature sample can be generated by the REM.In the process of evidence fusion,the hierarchical ER fusion model is designed which includes two-level fusion operations.In the first level operation,k-NN algorithm is used to search for the k historical samples close to the online sample and then ER rule is used to fuse the k+1 pieces of diagnosis evidence of k historical samples and the online sample.In the second level operation,the multiple first level fusion results coming from different features can be fused again.Thus the diagnosis decision can be made according to the second level fusion results.Furthermore,the objective fusion is constructed based on evidential Euclidean distance to optimize the importance weights of evidence.Final,some diagnosis experiments on a rotor test bed are conducted to compare the proposed hierarchical ER fusion method with the previous single level ER fusion method.The experimental results show that the new method can effectively promote diagnosis rate by enhancing the evidential accuracy and adding historical sample for information expansion.
作者 徐晓滨 叶梓发 徐晓健 侯平智 王琪冰 茹晓英 XU Xiao-bin;YE Zi-fa;XU Xiao-jian;HOU Ping-zhi;WANG Qi-bing;RU Xiao-ying(School of Automation,Hangzhou Dianzi University,Hangzhou Zhejiang 310018,China;HangZhou YanShi S&T Co.,Ltd,Hangzhou Zhejiang 310018,China;SRH Elevator Co.,Ltd,Huzhou Zhejiang 313013,China)
出处 《控制理论与应用》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2020年第8期1681-1692,共12页 Control Theory & Applications
基金 NSFC-浙江两化融合联合基金项目(U1709215) 国家自然科学基金项目(61903108) 浙江省重点研发计划项目(2019C03104,2018C04020,2018C01031)资助.
关键词 故障诊断 信息融合 证据推理 k-NN算法 分层式证据推理 fault diagnosis information fusion evidence reasoning(ER) k-NN algorithm hierarchical ER
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献18

  • 1邓勇,朱振福,钟山.基于证据理论的模糊信息融合及其在目标识别中的应用[J].航空学报,2005,26(6):754-758. 被引量:63
  • 2文成林,徐晓滨.多源不确定信息融合理论及应用-故障诊断与可靠性评估[M].北京:科学出版社,2012:41-86.
  • 3朱大奇,刘永安.故障诊断的信息融合方法[J].控制与决策,2007,22(12):1321-1328. 被引量:77
  • 4OUKHELLOU L, DEBIOLLES A, DENOEUX T, et ;d. Fault diag- nosis in railway track circuits using Dempster-Shafer classifier fu- sion [J]. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 2010, 23(1): 117 - 128.
  • 5XU X, ZHOU Z, WEN C L. Data fusion algorithm of l~tult diagnosis considering sensor measurement uncertainty [J]. lnten*ational Jour- nal on Smart Sensing and Intelligent System, 2013, 6(1 ): 171 - 190.
  • 6SHAFER G. A Mathematical Theory of Evidence [M]. Princeton, NJ, USA: Princeton University Press, 1976.
  • 7YANG J B, XU D L. Evidence reasoning rule for evidence combina- tion [J]. Artificiallntelligence, 2013, 205(12): 1 -29.
  • 8SIX S, HU C H, YANG J B, et al. On the dynamic evidential rea- soning algorithm for fault prediction [J]. Expert Systems with Appli- cations, 2011, 38(5): 5061 - 5081.
  • 9KONG G L, XU D L, YANG J B, et al. Combined medical quality as- sessment using the evidential reasoning approach [J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2015, 42(13): 5522 - 5530.
  • 10YANG G L, YANG J B, LIU W B, et al. Cross-efficiency aggregation in DEA models using the evidential-reasoning approach [J]. Euro- pean Journal of Operational Research, 2013, 231(2): 393 - 404.

共引文献43

同被引文献66

引证文献10

二级引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部