学术共同体与中日建筑学专业期刊发展关系的比较

Comparison of the relationship between the academic community and the development of Chinese and Japanese architectural journals

【目的】对于我国建筑学专业期刊发展中存在的领域界定、检索认定模糊等问题,通提出一种基于学术共同体自信构筑的破解方法。【方法】通过对中日建筑学专业期刊发展进行对比,得出对我国相关期刊发展的启示,并着手于相应路径的调整。【结果】利用相关体制改革窗口,拉近期刊与学术共同体的关联,并通过学术共同体的协同攻坚,明确建筑学专业及期刊的身份认证与可能发展途径。【结论】利用学术共同体自信修正期刊发展路线,紧密期刊与学科发展的关系,可帮助期刊在充分发挥行业综合发展成果的载体作用的同时塑造自身品牌与价值。

[Purposes]Focusing on the problems in the development of architectural journals in China,such as the field definition and the fuzzy identification of retrieval,this paper proposes a solution based on the self-confidence construction of academic community.[Methods]By comparing the development of Chinese and Japanese architecture professional journals,the enlightenment for the development of related journals in China was obtained and the adjustment of corresponding routes was started.[Findings]Through the window of relevant structural reform,the relationship between the journals and the academic community can be brought closer.And through the cooperation of the academic community to assault fortified positions,the identity authentication of architectural specialty and journals and possible developing routes are clarified.[Conclusions]Using the selfconfidence of the academic community to revise the developing route of journals,the relationship between journals and the development of disciplines can be closely connected,which can help journals shape their brand and value while giving full play to the carrier function of the comprehensive development achievements of the industry.