摘要
张维迎以奥地利学派的自由竞争和企业家精神来为市场的有效性提供支持,由此主张废除政府监管,废除反垄断法,废除产业政策。问题在于,张维迎对自由市场的运行以及企业家行为与后果的分析都是建立在“为己利他”行为机理基础上,却没有对这一行为机理的具体践行进行探讨,更无视市场行为背离这一行为机理的可能现实。正是基于先验的“信念”,张维迎对一些似是而非的命题(如市场经济是保持经济可持续增长的唯一制度,企业家精神是市场有效、有序运行的核心驱动力)也就缺乏反思;相应地,张维迎基于奥地利学派的企业家才能观所得出的一系列论断和政策主张也就经不住逻辑的考辨。
Zhang Weiying supports market effectiveness with free competition and entrepreneurial spirits of the Austrian School,and thus advocates the abolition of government supervision,anti-monopoly law and industrial policies.The problem about Zhang Weiying’s views is that his analysis of the operation of the free market and entrepreneurs’ behaviors and consequences are based on the behavior mechanism of "self-cultivation for beneflting others",but he did not explore the specific practice of this behavior mechanism and ignored the possibility that market behaviors may deviate from this behavior mechanism.Based on the transcendentalism "Belief",Zhang Weiying lacks reflection on some specious propositions(such as market economy is the only system maintain sustainable economic growth,and entrepreneur spirit is the core driving force for efficient and orderly market operation);accordingly,a series of conclusions and policy propositions proposed by Zhang Weiying based on the entrepreneur ability views of the Austrian School cannot withstand logical study and comparison.
出处
《当代经济研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2020年第8期53-64,F0003,共13页
Contemporary Economic Research
基金
广东省创新团队项目(2016WCXTD001)。
