期刊文献+

单髁置换术治疗膝骨关节炎对术后人工关节遗忘程度影响的Meta分析 被引量:5

Efficacy of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty on forgotten joint score in patients with knee osteoarthritis:a meta-analysis
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的系统评价单髁置换术治疗膝骨关节炎对术后人工关节遗忘程度的影响。方法计算机检索PubMed、EMbase、The Cochrane Library、Web of Science、CNKI、CBM、WanFang Data和VIP数据库,搜集单髁置换术治疗膝骨关节炎对术后人工关节遗忘程度影响的随机对照试验(RCT)和队列研究,检索时限均从建库至2019年12月31日。由2名研究者独立筛选文献、提取资料并评价纳入研究的偏倚风险后,采用RevMan 5.3软件进行Meta分析。结果共纳入2个RCT和11个队列研究。针对RCT的Meta分析结果显示,单髁置换术术后12个月的人工关节遗忘评分(FJS)高于后交叉韧带稳定型全膝关节置换术[MD=9.23,95%CI(0.53,17.93),P=0.04]。针对队列研究的Meta分析结果显示,单髁置换术术后6周[MD=8.90,95%CI(6.87,10.94),P<0.00001]、6个月[MD=18.72,95%CI(8.71,28.74),P=0.0002]、1年[MD=13.41,95%CI(8.87,17.95),P<0.00001]和末次随访时[MD=0.99,95%CI(0.47,1.54),P=0.0002]的FJS均高于后交叉韧带稳定型全膝关节置换术。结论现有证据显示单髁置换术治疗膝骨关节炎,在术后FJS方面优于后交叉韧带稳定型全膝关节置换术。受纳入研究数量和质量的限制,上述结论尚待更多高质量研究予以验证。 Objectives To systematically review the efficacy of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty on forgotten joint score(FJS)in patients with knee osteoarthritis.Methods PubMed,EMbase,The Cochrane Library,Web of Science,CNKI,CBM,WanFang Data and VIP databases were electronically searched to collect randomized controlled trials(RCTs)and cohort studies on unicompartmental knee arthroplasty on FJS in patients with knee osteoarthritis from inception to December 31st,2019.Two reviewers independently screened literature,extracted data and assessed risk of bias of included studies,then,meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.3 software.Results A total of 2 RCTs and 11 cohort studies were included.The results of meta-analysis based on RCTs showed that:compared to posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty(PS-TKA),unicompartmental knee arthroplasty could improve FJS on 12-month(MD=9.23,95%CI 0.53 to 17.93,P=0.04)after operation.The results of meta-analysis based on cohort studies showed that:compared to PS-TKA,unicompartmental knee arthroplasty could improve FJS on 6-week(MD=8.90,95%CI 6.87 to 10.94,P<0.00001),6-month(MD=18.72,95%CI 8.71 to 28.74,P=0.0002),1-year after operation(MD=13.41,95%CI 8.87 to 17.95,P<O.OOO 01),and the last follow-up(MD=0.99,95%CI 0.47 to 1.54,P=0.0002).Conclusions Current evidence shows that,comparing with PS-TKA,unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in knee osteoarthritis shows advantage in the improvement of FJS.Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies,more high-quality studies are required to verify above conclusions.
作者 吕燃 陈能 刘少南 杨丽虹 郭新峰 LU Ran;CHEN Neng;LIU Shaonan;YANG Lihong;GUO Xinfeng(The Second Clinical Medical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine,Guangzhou 510120,P.R.China;The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine/Zhuhai Hospital of Guangdong Province Traditional Chinese Medical Hospital,Zhuhai 519000,P.R.China;The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine/Guangdong Hospital of Chinese Medicine,Guangzhou 510120,P.R.China)
出处 《中国循证医学杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2020年第8期956-961,共6页 Chinese Journal of Evidence-based Medicine
基金 国家重点研发计划资助(编号:2019YFC1709802) 广东省科技计划项目(编号:2017ZC0161,2017ZC0197) 珠海市医疗卫生科技计划项目(编号:20181117E030048)。
关键词 单髁置换术 膝骨关节炎 人工关节遗忘评分 META分析 系统评价 随机对照试验 队列研究 Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty Knee osteoarthritis Forgotten joint score Meta-analysis Systematic review Randomized controlled trial Cohort study
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献43

  • 1张启栋,郭万首,刘朝晖,程立明,张念非,史振才,岳德波.内翻畸形膝骨关节炎软骨磨损的临床研究[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2013,21(23):2345-2350. 被引量:20
  • 2周一新.人工膝关节假体设计对人工全膝关节置换术后髌股关节功能的影响(下)[J].中华骨科杂志,2006,26(10):717-720. 被引量:5
  • 3Koskinen E,Eskelinen A,Paavolainen P. Comparison of survival and cost-effectiveness between unicondylar ar- throplasty and total knee arthroplasty in patients with primary osteoarthrilis:a follow-up study of 50,493 knee replacements fi'om tile finnish arthroplasty register[ J ]. Acta Orthop ,2008,79 ( 4 ) :499-507.
  • 4Niinimaki TF, Eskelinen A, Ohtonen P. Incidence of os- teotomies around the knee for the treatment of knee os- teoarthritis: a 22-year population-based study [ J ]. Int Orthop,2012,36 (7) : 1399-1402.
  • 5Baker PN, Petheram T, Jameson SS. Comparison of pa- tient-reported outcome measures following total and uni- condylar knee replacement[ J ]. J Bone Joint Surg(Br) , 2012,94( 7 ) :919-927.
  • 6Lygre SH, Espehaug B,Havelin LI. Pain and function in patients ',filer primary unieompartmental and total knee arthroplasty [ J ]. J Bone Joint Surg ( Am ), 2012,92 (18) :2890-2897.
  • 7Lyons MC, MacDonald SJ,Naudie DD. Unieompartmen- tal versus total knee arthroplastydatabase analysis: is there a winner? [ J ]. Clin Orthop Relat Res ,2012, 470 ( 1 ) :84-90.
  • 8Noticewala MS, Geller JA, l,ee JH. Unieompartmental knee arthroplasty relieves pain and improves function more than total knee arthropIasty [ J ]. J Arthroplasty, 2012,27 ( 8 ) :99-105.
  • 9Sun PF,Jia YH. Mobile bearing UKA compared to fixed bearing TKA: a randomized prospeetive study [ J ]. Knee,2012,19(2) :103-106.
  • 10Thompson SM, Salmon LJ, Webb JM. Construct validity and test re-test reliability of the Forgotten Joint Score [J]. J Arthroplasty,2015,12(3) :181-185.

共引文献105

同被引文献37

引证文献5

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部