期刊文献+

急性上消化道出血患者输血策略的研究进展 被引量:12

Research progress on transfusion strategies for acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding
下载PDF
导出
摘要 急性上消化道出血是一种常见的医疗急症,患者以呕血和黑便为主要临床表现,是红细胞输注最常见指征之一。但从早期开始,消化道出血患者的输血阈值就一直未被确定,最佳输注阈值存在争议。近年来,随着医学的发展与进步,人们对输血的认知程度不断加深,输血方式、输血策略及输血观点都在随着时间的推移而不断优化和改变。越来越多的研究结果表明,在很多情况下,限制性输血与开放性输血相比,患者有相似的,甚至更好的转归和预后。目前主流观点认为消化道出血患者更适合采取限制性输血策略,该输血策略在节约血液资源、降低输血不良反应发生风险的同时又不会对患者产生不利影响,甚至有利于患者预后。本文就急性上消化道出血患者输血策略的相关研究进展作一综述。 Acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding is a common medical emergency whose main clinical manifestations are hematemesis and melena. It is a leading indication for red blood cell transfusion worldwide, although optimal thresholds for transfusion are debated. In recent years, with the development and progress of medicine, people′s understanding of blood transfusion has been deepened and the transfusion methods/strategies have been continuously optimized over time. More and more studies have shown that restrictive transfusion method has similar, even better effect than open transfusion method in many cases. At present, the mainstream view is that patients with acute gastrointestinal bleeding are more suitable for restrictive transfusion strategy, which can save blood resources, reduce the risk of adverse transfusion reactions and even be conducive to the patients′ prognosis in some extent. This article will provide a brief overview on transfusion strategy for acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
作者 田雪 孔玉洁 练正秋 刘忠 TIAN Xue;KONG Yujie;LIAN Zhengqiu;LIU Zhong(Key Laboratory of Transfusion Adverse Reactions,Institute of Blood Transfusion,Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences&Peking Union Medical College;The Third People's Hospital of Chengdu)
出处 《中国输血杂志》 CAS 2020年第5期539-542,共4页 Chinese Journal of Blood Transfusion
基金 中国医学科学院医学与健康科技创新工程(2016-I2M-3-024) 中国医学科学院中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费专项资金(2018PT32016)。
关键词 急性上消化道出血 限制性输血 开放性输血 输血策略 acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding restrictive blood transfusion open transfusion transfusion strategy
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献24

  • 1LauJY, SungJ, HillC, et al. Systematic review of the epidemiology of complicated peptic ulcer disease: incidence, recurrence, risk factors and mortality[J]. Digestion, 2011,84(2):102–113. DOI: 10.1159/000323958.
  • 2RockeyDC. Occult and obscure gastrointestinal bleeding: causes and clinical management[J]. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2010,7(5):265–279. DOI: 10.1038/nrgastro.2010.42.
  • 3SrygleyFD, GerardoCJ, TranT, et al. Does this patient have a severe upper gastrointestinal bleed?[J]. JAMA, 2012,307(10):1072–1079. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2012.253.
  • 4BaiY, DuYQ, WangD, et al. Peptic ulcer bleeding in China: a multicenter endoscopic survey of 1006 patients[J]. J Dig Dis, 2014,15(1):5–11. DOI: 10.1111/1751–2980.12104.
  • 5RockallTA, LoganRF, DevlinHB, et al. Risk assessment after acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage[J]. Gut, 1996,38(3):316–321.
  • 6BlatchfordO, MurrayWR, BlatchfordM. A risk score to predict need for treatment for upper-gastrointestinal haemorrhage[J]. Lancet, 2000,356(9238):1318–1321.
  • 7StanleyAJ, DaltonHR, BlatchfordO, et al. Multicentre comparison of the Glasgow Blatchford and Rockall Scores in the prediction of clinical end-points after upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage[J]. Aliment Pharmacol Ther, 2011,34(4):470–475. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365–2036.2011.04747.x.
  • 8SaltzmanJR, TabakYP, HyettBH, et al. A simple risk score accurately predicts in-hospital mortality, length of stay, and cost in acute upper GI bleeding[J]. Gastrointest Endosc, 2011,74(6):1215–1224. DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.06.024.
  • 9YakaE, Y?lmazS, DogˇanN?,et al. Comparison of the Glasgow-Blatchford and AIMS65 scoring systems for risk stratification in upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the emergency department[J]. Acad Emerg Med, 2015,22(1):22–30. DOI: 10.1111/acem.12554.
  • 10RobertsonM, MajumdarA, BoyapatiR, et al. Risk stratification in acute upper GI bleeding: comparison of the AIMS65 score to the Glasgow-Blatchford and Rockall scoring systems[J/OL].Gastrointest Endosc, 2015 [2015-11-21]. http://www.giejournal.org/article/S0016-5107(15)03037-0/pdf.[published online ahead of print October 26, 2015]. DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.10.021.

共引文献122

同被引文献110

引证文献12

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部