期刊文献+

成人慢性原发性ITP患者利妥昔单抗疗效的影响因素及Plt计数预测价值探讨 被引量:2

Influencing Factors on Prognosis of Adult Patients with Chronic Primary ITP Treated with Rituximab and Predictive Value of Platelet Count
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨成人慢性原发性免疫性血小板减少症(ITP)患者利妥昔单抗疗效的影响因素及血小板(Plt)数预测价值。方法:回顾性分析本院2012年1月-2016年12月收治的52例行利妥昔单抗治疗成人慢性原发性ITP患者的临床资料,其中治疗失败32例设为A组,治疗成功20例设为B组,分析影响利妥昔单抗疗效的独立危险因素,观察首次诊断骨髓CD41^+巨核细胞计数对治疗随访1年患者治疗反应率的影响,计算Plt数用于疗效预测时,效能指标及最佳截断点。结果:B组首次诊断骨髓CD41^+巨核细胞数水平高于A组(P<0.05)。多因素Logistic回归模型分析结果显示,首次诊断骨髓CD41^+巨核细胞数<150是影响利妥昔单抗疗效的独立危险因素(OR=5.40,95%CI:1.82-15.66,P=0.00)。首次诊断骨髓CD41^+巨核细胞数≥150组患者随访1年反应率显著高于<150组(P<0.05)。B组利妥昔单抗首次治疗后d 3、14、21、30、60、90、180、270和360 Plt数水平显著低于A组(P<0.05)。ROC曲线分析结果显示,Plt数最佳截断点为50×10^9/L;利妥昔单抗首次治疗后d14,AUC为0.68(95%CI:0.57-0.78,P=0.00);成人慢性原发性ITP患者利妥昔单抗疗效预测敏感度和特异度分别为48.73%和87.58%;利妥昔单抗治疗后d 30和60 AUC分别为0.74(95%CI:0.64-0.87)(P=0.00)和0.93(95%CI:0.82-0.98)(P=0.00)。结论:成人慢性原发性ITP患者接受利妥昔单抗治疗后,部分可获得长期缓解,但骨髓巨核细胞数<150的患者预后较差;同时根据利妥昔单抗治疗后d 14、30及60 Plt数能够有效预测患者的远期疗效,指导治疗的方案制定。 Objective:To investigate the influencing factors on prognosis of adult patients with chronic primary immune thrombocytopeuia(ITP)after rituximab treatment and predictive value of platelet(Plt)count.Methods:Clinical data of 52 adult patients with chronic primary ITP treated with rituximab from January 2012 to December 2016 were retrospectively analyzed,including 32 patients for failed in treatment as group A and 20 patients for succeeded in treatment as group B.The independent risk factors influencing the clinical efficacy of rituximab were analyzed.The influence of CD41^+megakaryocyte count in bone marrow diagnosed for first time on the response rate of patients with 1-year followed-up were observed,and the Plt count were calculated to predict the clinical efficacy index and the best cutoff point.Results:The CD41^+megakaryocyte count in bone marrow for first time treatment in group B were significantly higher than that in group A(P<0.05).Multivariate Logistic regression analysis showed that the number of CD41^+megakaryocytes in bone marrow<150 at first diagnosis was the independent risk factor influencing the clinical efficacy of rituximab(OR=5.40,95%CI:1.82-15.66,P=0.00).The response rate of 1-year followed-up in patients with CD41^+megakaryocyte count≥150 at first diagnosis was significantly higher than that of CD41^+megakaryocyte count<150(P<0.05).The Plt count level in group B was significantly lower than that in group A at the 3rd,14th,21th,30th,60th,90th,180th,270th and 360th days after first treatment with rituximab(P<0.05).ROC curve analysis showed that the best cut-off point for Plt count was 50×10^9/L and AUC was 0.68 at the 14th day after first treatment with rituximab(95%CI:0.57-0.78,P=0.00).The predictive sensitivity and specificity of clinical efficacy in adult patients with chronic primary ITP treated with rituximab were separately 48.73%and 87.58%,and the AUC in 30th and 60th day after rituximab treatment were separately 0.74(95%CI:0.64-0.87,P=0.00),0.93(95%CI:0.82-0.98,P=0.00).Conclusion:Adult patients with chronic primary ITP may possess long-term remission after rituximab treatment,but the prognosis is poor for patients with bone marrow megakaryocyte count<150.The Plt counts in 14th,30th and 60th days after rituximab treatment can effectively predict the long-term clinical efficacy and guide the formulation of treatment plans.
作者 胡莉娜 刘怡 刘一岚 但刚 HU Li-Na;LIU Yi;LIU Yi-Lan;DAN Gang(Department of Clinical Laboratorial Examination,Western Theater General Hospital of People′s Liberation Army,Chengdu 610083,Sichuan Province,China;Medical Technology College of Chongqing Medical College,Chongqing 401331,China;Department of Hematology,Western Theater General Hospital of People′s Liberation Army,Chengdu 610083,Sichuan Province,China)
出处 《中国实验血液学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2020年第4期1332-1337,共6页 Journal of Experimental Hematology
关键词 ITP 免疫治疗 PLT计数 预后 影响因素 ITP immunotherapy Plt count prognosis influencing factor
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献53

  • 1钱新宏,焦西英,李如英,张晓立.特发性血小板减少性紫癜患儿血清IL-8和IFN-α水平的检测[J].中国现代医学杂志,2005,15(24):3755-3756. 被引量:2
  • 2王军,胡玉莲,王西阁,冯建飞,汤有才.特发性血小板减少性紫癜患儿sCD40配体及其mRNA表达水平的变化[J].中华血液学杂志,2006,27(5):348-349. 被引量:4
  • 3Andy Trotti,A.Dimitrios Colevas,Ann Setser,Valerie Rusch,David Jaques,Volker Budach,Corey Langer,Barbara Murphy,Richard Cumberlin,C.Norman Coleman,Philip Rubin.CTCAE v3.0: development of a comprehensive grading system for the adverse effects of cancer treatment[J]. Seminars in Radiation Oncology . 2003 (3)
  • 4Roberto Stasi.Immune Thrombocytopenia: Pathophysiologic and Clinical Update[J].Semin Thromb Hemost.2012(05)
  • 5Ji Lili,Zhan Yanxia,Hua Fanli,Li Feng,Zou Shanhua,Wang Weiguang,Song Dongli,Min Zhihui,Chen Hao,Cheng Yunfeng.The ratio of treg/th17 cells correlates with the disease activity of primary immune thrombocytopenia. PloS one . 2012
  • 6Arnold Donald M,Dentali Francesco,Crowther Mark A,Meyer Ralph M,Cook Richard J,Sigouin Christopher,Fraser Graeme A,Lim Wendy,Kelton John G.Systematic review: efficacy and safety of rituximab for adults with idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura. Annals of Internal Medicine . 2007
  • 7Flores-Borja Fabian,Bosma Anneleen,Ng Dorothy,Reddy Venkat,Ehrenstein Michael R,Isenberg David A,Mauri Claudia.CD19+CD24hiCD38hi B Cells Maintain Regulatory T Cells While Limiting TH1 and TH17 Differentiation. Science translational medicine . 2013
  • 8ProvanD, StasiR, NewlandAC, et al. International consensus report on the investigation and management of primary immune thrombocytopenia[J]. Blood,2010,115(2):168-186.
  • 9NeunertC, LimW, CrowtherM, et al. The American Society of Hematology 2011 evidence-based practice guideline for immune thrombocytopenia[J]. Blood,2011,117(16):4190-4207.
  • 10British Committee for Standards in Haematology General Haematology Task Force. Guidelines for the investigation and management of idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura in adults, children and in pregnancy[J]. Br J Haematol,2003,120(4):574-596. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2141.2003.04131.x.

共引文献448

同被引文献25

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部