期刊文献+

Quadrant通道下经椎间孔椎体融合术与开放后路椎体融合术治疗腰椎滑脱症的临床疗效比较

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较Quadrant通道下经椎间孔椎体融合术与开放后路椎体融合术治疗腰椎滑脱症的疗效。方法选择我院2017年1月~2018年6月期间接受治疗的腰椎滑脱症患者100例,按照手术方法分为对照组和研究组各50例。研究组使用Quadrant通道下经椎间孔椎体融合术治疗,对照组使用开放后路椎体融合术治疗.比较两组患者的切口长度、术中出血量、手术时间、住院时间、疼痛视觉模拟评分及Os-westry功能障碍指数评分。结果研究组的切口长度短于对照组,术中出血量少于对照组,手术时间、住院时间短于对照组,VAS评分、ODI评分低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 Quadrant通道下经椎间孔椎体融合术治疗腰椎滑脱症患者的临床疗效更好,值得在临床治疗中进一步推广。
作者 曾晖
出处 《现代诊断与治疗》 CAS 2020年第10期1593-1594,共2页 Modern Diagnosis and Treatment
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献41

  • 1Drury T,Ames S E,Costi K,et al.Degenerative spondylolisthesis in patients with neurogenic claudication effects functional performance and self-reported quality of life[J].Spine,2009,34(25):2 812-2 817.
  • 2Burak M,Ozgur Kevin,Yoo Gerardo Rodriguez,William R Taylor.Minimally-invasive techniquefor transforaminal lumbar interbodyfusion(TLIF).Eur Spine J,2005,14:887-894.
  • 3Ozgur B M,Yoo K,Rodriguez G,et al.Minimally-invasive techniquefor transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion(TLIF)[J].Eur Spine J,2005,14(9):887-894.
  • 4Yee TJ, Terman SW, La Marca F, et al. Comparison of adjacent seg- ment disease after minimally invasive or open transforamlnal lumbar interbody fusion[J]. J Chn Neurosci ,2014,21 (10) :1796-1801.
  • 5Wang S J, Han YC, Pan FM, et al. Single tartan cage via M1S-TLIF approach for the treatment of degenerative lumbar dis- ease: a technical note[J]. Int J Clin Exp Med,2015,8(8) :14154-14160.
  • 6Zeng H, Wang X, Zhang P, et al. Single-stage posterior transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion, debridement, limited decompression, 3-col- umn reconstruction, and posterior instrumentation in surgical treatment for single-segment lumbar spinal tuberculosis[ J]. Acta Orthop Trau-matol Turc,2015,49 (5) :513-521.
  • 7Joseph JR, Smith BW, La Marca F, et al. Comparison of complication rates of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and lateral lumbar interbody fusion: a systematic review of the literature [ J]. Neurosurg Focus ,2015,39 (4) : E4.
  • 8Sidhu GS, Henkelman E, Vaeeam AR, et al. Minimally invasive versus open posterior lumbar interbody fusion : a systematic review [ J ]. Clin Orthop Relat Res,2014,472 (6) : 1792-1799.
  • 9Wiltse LL, Bateman JG, Hutchinson RH, et al. The paraspinal sacro- spinalis-splitting approach to the lumbar spine [ J ]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1968,50 (5) :919-926.
  • 10Zhang W, Li X, Shang X, et al. Modified minimally invasive transfo- raminal lumbar interbody fusion using a trans-muhifidus approach: a safe and effective alternative to open-TLIF [ J ]. J Orthop Surg Res, 2015,10(1) :93.

共引文献44

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部