期刊文献+

利益、控制与信用:基于SZY大学产学研合作的案例研究

Interest, Control and Credit:A Case Study on the Industry-University-Research Collaboration of SZY-University
原文传递
导出
摘要 改革开放以来,高校与企业的产学研合作快速发展,信用纠纷日渐增多却普遍“无解”,给产学研合作的健康发展带来了负面影响。学术界对此现象进行了初步揭示,但是缺乏深入扎实的案例研究和理论建构。本文以信用理论解释为工具,采取案例研究方法,对SZY大学产学研合作情况进行了为期近6年的调查,对信用纠纷的表现和原因进行了分析,发现单纯的市场机制或社会机制对于确保合作信用都具有局限性,以至于近年来国家对高校的产学研合作进行了整改和整顿。在此基础上,本文对现有的信用理论解释进行了反思,并作出了初步的修正完善。 Since the Reform and Opening up,with the fast development of the industry-university-research collaboration between university and enterprise,credit disputes became a growing but unsolved phenomenon,which has brought negative impact on the healthy development of industry-university-research collaboration.Previous literature has examined this issue preliminarily,but there is few in-depth and solid case studies and theoretical construction.Based on theories of credit and taking a case study approach,this study investigated the industry-university-research collaboration at SZY University over a period of almost six years,and analyzed the manifestation and causes of cooperative credit disputes.It is found that a simple market or social mechanism alone has limitations for ensuring cooperative credit,so much so that in recent years,the government has carried out rectification on the industry-university-research collaboration between university and enterprise.On this basis,this paper reflects on the existing credit theory,and makes a preliminary revision and improvement of the theory.
作者 能建国 NENG Jian-guo(Graduate School of Education,Peking University,Beijing,100871)
出处 《清华大学教育研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2020年第3期86-97,共12页 Tsinghua Journal of Education
基金 教育部人文社科重点研究基地北京大学教育经济研究所重大课题“经济新常态下高校人才培养模式改革与人力资本生产研究”(16JJD880003)。
关键词 大学 产学研合作 利益 控制 信用 university industry-university-institute cooperation interest control credit
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献35

  • 1高西庆,赵谦.信用在法制结构中的位置[J].比较,2004,(10).
  • 2马克斯·韦伯.《儒教与道教》[M].江苏人民出版社,2003年版.第78页.
  • 3Alesina, Alberto & La Ferrara, Eliana, 2000, The determinants of trust, in NBER Working Papers, No.7621.
  • 4Huck, Steffen, 1998, Trust, treason, and trials: an example of how the evolution of preferences can be driven by legal institutions, in Journal of Law,Economics, and Organization, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 44-60.
  • 5Knack, Stephen & Keefer, Philip, 1997, Does social capital have an economic payoff? -a cross-country investigation, in The Quarterly Journal of Economics,Vol. 112, No .4,pp. 1251-1288.
  • 6Kay, Neil M., 1996, The economics of trust, in International Journal of the Economics of Business, Vol.3, No. 2, pp. 249-261.
  • 7Lewicki, R. J. & Bunker, B. B., 1995, Trust in relationships: a model of development and decline, in Bunker,B. B. & Rubin, J. Z. (eds.), 1995, Conflict,Cooperations and Justice, Essays Inspired by the Work of Morton Deutsch, San Francisco, Jossey-Bass, pp. 133-174.
  • 8Barney, J. B. & Hansen, M. H., 1994, Trustworthiness as a source of competitive advantage, in Strategic Management Journal ,Vol. 15 ,pp. 175-190.
  • 9Putnam, Robert, 1993, Making democracy work: civic traditions in modern Italy, Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 3-16, pp. 63-185.
  • 10Fudenberg, D.; Kreps, D. M. & Maskin, E., 1990,Repeated games with long-run and short-run players, in Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 57, pp. 555-573.

共引文献56

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部