期刊文献+

语用逻辑的研究路径及其发展方向 被引量:8

The Research Path and Developmental Direction of Pragmatic Logic
原文传递
导出
摘要 语用逻辑属于逻辑学与语言学的交叉研究领域,其演进过程可概括为“两进路”“三方案”和“四阶段”。“两进路”分别是规范描述型的趋语用化进路和描述规范型的去语用化进路;“三方案”是指零语用的演绎逻辑方案、准语用的归纳逻辑方案和语用化的非形式逻辑方案;“四阶段”是指“语用开端”“去语用化”“准语用化”和“语用回归”四个阶段。迄今为止,语用逻辑学的两条研究进路似乎一直在互不理解地独立发展着,其核心问题即是如何处理语用问题。因此,语用逻辑的深度拓展需要融合两条传统研究进路,开辟出一个新的发展方向。 Pragmatic logic belongs to the interdisciplinary field of logic and linguistics,and its evolutionary process can be summarized as“two paths,”“three schemes”and“four stages.”The“two paths”are the normative-descriptive type of path moving toward pragmaticalization and the descriptive-normative type of depragmaticalization;the“three schemes”refers to the deductive logic scheme of zero-pragmatics,the inductive logic scheme of quasi-pragmatics,and the non-formal logic scheme of pragmaticalization;and the“four stages”refers to the four phases of“initiation of pragmatics,”“de-pragmaticalization,”“quasi-pragmaticalization,”and“the return to pragmatics.”So far,the two approaches to logic in pragmatics seem to be developing independently without mutual understanding.The core issue is dealing with the problem of pragmatics.Therefore,the in-depth development of logic in pragmatics needs to integrate the two traditional research approaches and thus open up a new direction for development.
作者 熊明辉 Xiong Minghui
出处 《中国社会科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2020年第8期24-46,204,205,共25页 Social Sciences in China
基金 国家社会科学基金重大项目“语用逻辑的深度拓展与应用研究”(19ZDA042)阶段性成果。
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献10

  • 1Susan Haack.Philosophy of Logic[]..1978
  • 2Irving M Copi,,Carl Cohen.Introduction to Logic[]..1994
  • 3Christopher W Tindale.Acts of Arguing:A Rhetoric Modelof Argument[]..1999
  • 4Cf Joseph Horovitz.Law and Logic[]..1972
  • 5Robert J Fogelin,,Walter Sinnott-Armstrong.UnderstandingArguments[]..2001
  • 6Chris Reed,Douglas N Walton.Argumentation Schemes in Ar-gument-as-process and Argument-as-product[].Pro-ceedings of the Conference Celebrating Informal Logic.2003
  • 7Jürgen Habermas.The Theory of Communicative Action[]..1984
  • 8James B Freeman.Dialectics and the Macrostructure ofArguments[]..1991
  • 9Chaim Perelman,,Olbrechts-Tyteca.The New Rhetoric[]..1969
  • 10Daniel J O’Keefe.Two Concepts of Argument[].Journal ofthe American Forensic Association.1977

共引文献22

同被引文献70

引证文献8

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部