期刊文献+

科学实践与本体论历史主义——以历史知识论为例 被引量:4

Scientific Practices and the Ontological Historicism:With Historical Epistemology as an Example
下载PDF
导出
摘要 20世纪下半叶的科学哲学历史转向坚持科学哲学应该建立在科学史研究的基础之上。然而,吉尔曾指出,在科学哲学研究中,科学史到底起到了什么样的知识论层面上的作用从来没有被很好地理解过。最近对科学实践中各类本体论承诺的历史性研究对吉尔所提出的问题提供了一种回应的可能。在此使用瓦托夫斯基的历史知识论来说明这点。他的历史知识论还展示了,建立在科学史上的科学哲学要求以实践而非以理论为中心,因而它必定是一种自然主义的科学实践哲学。 The historical turn in philosophy of science in the second half of the 20th century claimed that philosophy of science needed to base its inquiry on history of science.However,as Ronald Giere argues,what an epistemic role history of science can play in philosophy of science has not been well understood.Recent studies of how different ontological commitments in scientific practices have been historically established can be a useful starting point to understand this relationship.Historical epistemology is a good example to show this point.Besides,Wartofsky’s historical epistemology also shows that a philosophy of science based on history of science should be a naturalist approach centered on practices instead of theories,and hence it should be a version of philosophy of scientific practices.
作者 黄翔 HUANG Xiang
出处 《哲学分析》 CSSCI 2020年第4期3-16,196,共15页 Philosophical Analysis
基金 教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目“当代国外社会科学方法论新形态及中国化研究”(项目编号:17JZD041)。
关键词 科学实践哲学 科学哲学的历史转向 历史知识论 罗纳德·吉尔 马克思·瓦托夫斯基 philosophy of scientific practices the historical turn in philosophy of science historical epistemology Ronald Giere Marx Wartofsky
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献16

  • 1Laudan, L. 'The History of Science and the Philosophy of Science'[A]. Olby, R. C. Cantor, G. N. Christie, J. R. R. Hodge, M. J. S.(eds.) Companion to the History of Modern Science[C1, London and New York: Routledge, 1990, 47- 59.
  • 2Clauzade, L. 'Histoire des Sciences et Philosophic des Sciences dans la Philosophic d'August Comte' [A]. Michel Bitbol and Jean Gayon (eds.) L'epistemologiefranqaise, 1830-1970[C]. Paris, PUF, 2006, 197-212.
  • 3Wartofsky, Mark M. 'The Relation Between Philosophy of Science and History of Science'[A]. M. W. Wartofsky Model: Representation and the Scientific Understanding [C]. Dordrecht and Boston: D. Reidel, 1979, 119-139.
  • 4Feyerabend, P. Against Method[M]. 3th edition, Great Britain: Verso, 1993.
  • 5Dear, P. Discipline and Experience: The Mathematical Way in the Scientific Revolution [M]. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1995.
  • 6Dews, P. 'Foucault and the French Tradition of Historical Epistemology' [J]. History of European Ideas, 1992, 14(3): 347-363.
  • 7Lecourt, D. 'Georges Canguilhem's Epistemological History' [A]. D. Lecourt, Marxism and Epistemology: Bachelard Canguilhem and Foucault[C]. London: NLB, 1975.
  • 8Wartofsky, Mark M. 'Epistemology Historicized' [A]. Abner Shimony and Debra Nails (eds.) Naturalistic Epistemology [C]. Dordrecht and Boston: D. Reidel, 1987, 357-374.
  • 9Wartofsky, Mark M. 'Perception, Representation and the Forms of Action: Towards an Historical Epistemology' [A]. M. W. Wartofsky Model: Representation and the Scientific Understanding[C]. Dordrecht and Boston: D. Reidel, 1979, 188-210.
  • 10Shimony, A. 'Comment on Wartofsky' [A] Abner Shimony and Debra Nails (eds.) Naturalistic Epistemology[C]. Dordrecht and Boston: D. Reidel, 1987, 375-377.

共引文献1

同被引文献21

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部