摘要
不能犯与具体危险犯的区分,对于客观行为危险性的判断有着极为重要的意义,但目前我国刑法界对于二者判断的标准有很多不同观点。文章通过对具体案例分析,认为应当站在事前角度,通过对危害结果或危险状态没有发生的原因进行分析,考虑该原因不出现可能性的大小。当原因不出现的可能性较大时,即认为行为属于具体危险犯;反之则为不能犯。同时具体危险犯与其他结果犯一样,也应当存在未遂形态。
The distinction between impossibility crime and specific dangerous crime is of great significance to the judgment of the danger of objective behavior. However,there are many different opinions on the standard of judging the two in the criminal law circle in China. Based on the analysis of specific cases,it concludes that we should stand in the perspective of advance,through the analysis of the causes of the harm results or the dangerous state,and consider the possibility of this reason not appearing. When the possibility of the cause that does not appear is greater,it is considered that the act belongs to the specific dangerous crime;otherwise,it is impossible to commit. At the same time,like other consequential crimes,concrete dangerous crimes should also have attempted forms.
作者
任增亮
REN Zeng-liang(Railway Transportation Branch of Jilin Provincial People’s Procuratorate,Changchun 130028,China)
出处
《哈尔滨学院学报》
2020年第9期73-76,共4页
Journal of Harbin University
关键词
以危险方法危害公共安全罪
具体危险犯
不能犯
犯罪未遂
the crime of endangering public security by dangerous means
specific dangerous crime
impossibility
attempted crime