摘要
《著作权法》颁布三十年来,由于立法修订的迟缓,大量新问题的解决只能依靠司法的诠释。立法文本与司法诠释之间的互动模式,既反映出立法语言对司法的影响,也反映出解释方法对统一裁判的重要性。立法应当关注司法的诠释经验,司法诠释须保持立法与司法的界分,并以规范目的和立法表述作为统一裁判的指引。
Since its enactment in 1990,the Copyright Law has not been amended timely,so the judicial interpretation has to be the main way for dealing with the new issues in the past 30 years.From the interaction models between legislative text and judicial interpretation,it can be found that the legislative language exerts great impact on judicial interpretation and the methodology of legal interpretation plays an important role for keeping the consistency of judicial decisions.Therefore,the legislature should attach importance to the judicial experience of interpreting the law,while the judiciary should maintain the legislative-judicial boundary and pursue the consistency of decisions under the guidance of legal purpose and language.
出处
《知识产权》
CSSCI
北大核心
2020年第8期8-20,共13页
Intellectual Property
关键词
著作权法
立法文本
司法诠释
法律解释方法
Copyright Law
legislative text
judicial interpretation
methodology of legal interpretation