期刊文献+

不同手术入路椎体成形术治疗胸腰段椎体压缩性骨折患者效果观察 被引量:2

Observation of the effect of vertebroplasty with different surgical approaches on patients with thoracolumbar vertebral compression fractures
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨不同手术入路的椎体成形治疗胸腰段椎体压缩性骨折患者效果观察。方法:选取2014年1月至2019年4月收治的70例胸腰段椎体压缩性骨折患者,随机分为A组和B组,均给予经皮椎体成形术治疗,其中A组给予单侧椎弓根入路,B组给予双侧椎弓根入路,比较两组手术临床指标、术前及术后1周Cobb角和视觉模拟评分法(visual analogue scale,VAS)评分、术前及术后1年Oswestry功能障碍指数。结果:A组手术时间、X线暴露次数低于B组,骨水泥注入量高于B组(P<0.05)。A组骨水泥渗漏率为14.29%、邻近椎体骨折率为14.29%,B组骨水泥渗漏率为5.71%、邻近椎体骨折率为2.86%,A组骨水泥渗漏率及邻近椎体骨折率均高于B组(P<0.05)。A组术中出血量(8.61±2.03)mL,B组术中出血量(9.01±1.86)mL,两组对比差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术前两组Cobb角、VAS评分差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),术后1周两组Cobb角、VAS评分均降低(P<0.05),但两组相比差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),术前两组Oswestry功能障碍指数差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),术后1年两组Oswestry功能障碍指数均降低(P<0.05),但两组相比差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:单、双侧椎弓根入路椎体成形术治疗胸腰段椎体压缩性骨折疗效相当,均可恢复椎体形态和功能,缓解患者疼痛,单侧入路手术时间短,辐射暴露低,双侧入路骨水泥注入量较少,分布均匀,能够降低骨水泥渗漏及邻近椎体骨折发生的风险。 Objective:To explore the effect of vertebroplasty with different surgical approaches on patients with thoracolumbar vertebral compression fractures.Methods:70 patients with thoracic and lumbar vertebral compression fractures admitted from January 2014 to April 2019 were randomly divided into groups A and B,all of whom were given percutaneous vertebroplasty.The group A was given a single lateral pedicle approach and the group B was given bilateral pedicle approach.The clinical indexes,Cobb angle and visual analogue scale(VAS)score preoperative and 1 week postoperative,Oswestry dysfunction index preoperative and 1 year after surgery were compared in the two groups.Results:The operation time and X-ray exposure times of group A were lower than those of group B,and the amount of bone cement injection was higher than that of group B(P<0.05).The bone cement leakage rate in group A was 14.29%,the adjacent vertebral body fracture rate was 14.29%;the bone cement leakage rate in group B was 5.71%,and the adjacent vertebral body fracture rate was 2.86%.The bone cement leakage rate and the adjacent vertebral body fracture rate were higher than those in group B(P<0.05).The intraoperative blood loss in group A was(8.61±2.03)mL,and that in group B was(9.01±1.86)mL.There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups(P>0.05).There was no significant difference in Cobb angle and VAS score between the two groups before surgery(P>0.05),and the Cobb angle and VAS score decreased in both groups at 1 week after surgery(P<0.05),but there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups(P>0.05).There was no statistically significant difference of Oswestry dysfunction index before surgery between the two groups(P>0.05),and the Oswestry dysfunction index of both groups decreased 1 year after surgery(P<0.05),but there was no significant difference between the two groups(P>0.05).Conclusion:The effects of vertebroplasty with unilateral and bilateral pedicle approach are equivalent in the treatment of thoracolumbar vertebral compression fractures.Both can restore the vertebral body shape and function and relieve the patient's pain.The unilateral approach has short operation time and radiation exposure.The bilateral pedicle approach can reduce the risk of bone cement leakage and adjacent vertebral body fractures with less injection of bone cement on both sides and even distribution.
作者 汤秋贤 TANG Qiuxian(Guangzhou Municipal Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine,Guangzhou 510800,China)
出处 《包头医学院学报》 CAS 2020年第5期31-33,共3页 Journal of Baotou Medical College
关键词 骨质疏松症 椎体压缩性骨折 椎体成形术 Osteoporosis Vertebral compression fracture Vertebroplasty
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献60

  • 1刘忠厚,杨定焯,朱汉民,王洪复,张柳,唐海,赵燕玲.中国人原发性骨质疏松症诊断标准(试行)[J].中国骨质疏松杂志,1999,5(1):1-3. 被引量:244
  • 2何仕诚,滕皋军,邓钢,方文,郭金和,朱光宇,李国昭,沈志萍,丁惠娟.再次椎体成形术的应用[J].介入放射学杂志,2005,14(3):270-273. 被引量:5
  • 3倪文飞,池永龙,林焱,徐华梓,黄其杉,毛方敏.经皮椎体强化术并发骨水泥渗漏的类型及其临床意义[J].中华外科杂志,2006,44(4):231-234. 被引量:81
  • 4Masala S, Magrini A, Taglieri A, et al. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients with osteoporotic ver- tebral compression fractures (OVCFs) :improvement of pul- monary function after percutaneous vertebroplasty (VTP) [J]. Eur Radiol,2014,24(7) :1577 -1585.
  • 5Anselmetti GC, Marcia S, Saba L, et al. Percutaneous verte- broplasty : multi - centric results from EVEREST experience in large cohort of patients[ J]. Eur J Radiol,2012,81 (12) : 4083 - 4086.
  • 6Wong CC, McGirt MJ. Vertebral compression fraetures:a review of current management and multimodal therapy [ J ]. J Muhidiscip Heahhc ,2013,17 (6) :205 - 214.
  • 7Lane NE. Epidemiology, etiology, and diagnosis of osteopo- rosis [ J ]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2006,194 ( 2 Suppl) : $3 - 11.
  • 8Retornaz F,Duque G. Osteoporosis in the elderly[ J]. Pres- se Med,2006,35(10 Pt 2) :1547 - 1556.
  • 9Wang HK, Lu K, Liang CL, et al. Comparing clinical out- comes following percutaneous vertebroplasty with conserva- tive therapy for acute osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures [ J]. Pain Med ,2010,11 ( 11 ) : 1659 - 1665.
  • 10Chen LH, Lai PL, Chen WJ. Unipedicle percutaneous verte- broplasty for spinal intraosseous vacuum cleft [ J ]. Clin Or- thop Relat Res,2005 ,435 :148 -153.

共引文献94

同被引文献21

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部