期刊文献+

在史法与史义之间:刘知幾的经史观与史学批评 被引量:2

Between Historiography and Historical Thought:Liu Zhiji’s View of Confucian Classics and History and His Historical Criticism
下载PDF
导出
摘要 刘知幾的经史观一直是《史通》研究的热点,也是学术界争议最大的问题之一,聚讼纷纭,莫衷一是。实际上,刘知幾是从史法和史义两个不同的层面来看待经史关系的。在史法层面,刘知幾贯穿经史,以经为史,把经书与史书并列,一同纳入到自身史学批评的系统里进行评骘,讨论史书名目、体裁流变、体例沿革、记事得失、文笔优劣等历史编纂学问题。在史义层面,刘知幾服膺孔子,效法圣人,尊崇经书“意旨”,以经义衡史,倡导经为史则,讨论著史宗旨、史学功用等形而上的问题,把经书中所蕴含的“明道淑世”的观念当作史书效法的原则。刘知幾以经史互释的方法进行史学批评,以经衡史,所强调的是经对史的指导;以史评经,所强调的是史对经的验证。在这种经史互释的过程中,刘知幾消解了经学的神秘化和神圣化,实现了经学的理性回归,彰显了史学的社会价值,并试图通过经史之互补,为经史之学的发展寻找出路。 Liu Zhiji’s view of Confucian classics and history has always been a hot topic in the study of Shitong(Historiography),and it is also the most controversial issue in the academic circle.There are many different opinions and it is difficult to give a decisive conclusion.In fact,Liu Zhiji looks upon the relationship between Confucian classics and history from two different perspectives:histori⁃ography and historical thought.At the level of historiography,Liu Zhiji intersects the history of the Confucian classics,taking the classics as the history,juxtaposing the classics with the historical books,and integrating them into his own system of historical criticism.He comments on such histori⁃ographical issues as the lists of historical books,the changes of the genres,the evolution of the genres,the gains and losses of the records,and the merits and demerits of the writings.At the level of historical thought,Liu Zhiji bears in mind Confucius,imitates the sage,venerates the“purport”of the classics,takes the classics as a balance of the history,advocates the classics as the historical principle,discusses the historical purpose,the historical function and other metaphysical issues,and takes the thought of“statecraft?ideology”in the classics as the principle of the historical books.Liu Zhiji’s historical criticism is based on mutual interpretation of classics and history.By balancing history with classics,he is emphasizing the guidance of classics to history,and through the evaluation of the classics,he is seeking for the verification of classics by history.In the process of this mutual interpretation of classics and history,Liu Zhiji dispels the mystery and sanctification of the classics,realizes the rational return of classics,demonstrates the social value of historiography,and tries to find a way for the development of classics and history through the complementarity of classics and history.
作者 王记录 丁文 WANG Ji-lu;DING Wen(School of History and Culture,Henan Normal University,Xinxiang 453007,China;School of History,Nankai University,Tianjin 300350,China)
出处 《河北学刊》 CSSCI 北大核心 2020年第5期93-103,共11页 Hebei Academic Journal
关键词 刘知幾 《史通》 史法 史义 经史观 史学批评 Liu Zhiji Shitong historiography historical thought view of Confucian classics and history historical criticism
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献24

  • 1齋木哲郎,曹峰.永贞革新与啖助、陆淳等春秋学派的关系--以大中之说为中心[J].西北大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2008,38(1):48-53. 被引量:9
  • 2周文玖.刘知几史学批评的特点[J].史学史研究,2007(2):24-33. 被引量:14
  • 3皮锡瑞.经学历史[M].北京:中华书局,2008.30.
  • 4刘昫.旧唐书[M].北京:中华书局,1975..
  • 5陈振孙 徐小蛮 顾美华点校.直斋书录解题[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1987..
  • 6.《十三经注疏》[M].上海古籍出版社,1997年版..
  • 7.《史通·自叙》[M].,..
  • 8郑樵.《通志·总序》[M].中华书局,1987年.第19页.
  • 9章学诚:《家书二》,《章学诚遗书》卷九,第92页,文物出版社1985年版
  • 10张振珮.史通笺注[M].贵阳:贵州人民出版社,1985.

共引文献28

同被引文献124

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部