期刊文献+

资源保存视角下高绩效人力资源系统对员工突破式创造力的双刃剑效应 被引量:27

The Double-edged Sword Effect of High Performance Work System on Employees’Radical Creativity Based on the Resource Conservation Perspective
原文传递
导出
摘要 高绩效人力资源系统能否促进创新是目前的研究热点,但却未获一致研究结论。根据资源保存理论,高绩效人力资源系统可能同时会激发员工进行资源投资和资源保护,形成不同的目标导向,进而对员工的突破式创造力产生差异性影响。此外,团队领导作为组织的代理人,团队层面领导方式是高绩效人力资源系统资源产生作用的重要条件。故本研究以目标导向为机制,分别探讨了高绩效人力资源系统对员工突破式创造力的学习目标导向和绩效目标导向两条不同的影响路径,并考察团队层面变革型领导和交易型领导对高绩效人力资源系统与员工突破式创造力关系的跨层次调节作用。实证结果表明:高绩效人力资源系统对员工突破式创造力具有“双刃剑”效应,团队层面变革型领导正向调节高绩效人力资源系统与突破式创造力的关系。团队层面交易型领导负向调节高绩效人力资源系统与员工突破式创造力的关系。研究结果不仅进一步拓展了高绩效人力资源系统对员工创造力的影响研究,而且揭示了高绩效人力资源系统对员工突破式创造力的影响机制和边界条件。 The question whether HPWS can generate innovation is a hot topic,but no widely accepted conclusion has been reached so far in this regard.According to resource conservation theory,HPWS may lead employees to invest in resources and protect resources to form different goal orientations,which will further have different impact on employees’radical creativity.Furthermore,team leaders as agents of organization is an important condition for the performance of HPWS.This study examines the multilevel moderating effect of transformational and transactional leadership on the relationship between HPWS and radical creativity through indirect effect of employees’goal orientation.Based on a survey data of 285 employees,the research shows that the HPWS has a double-edged sword effect on employees’radical creativity.Transformational leadership at the team level positively moderates the indirect effect of HPWS on radical creativity through learning goal orientation.Team level transactional leadership negatively moderates the indirect effect of HPWS on radical creativity through performance goal orientation.It indicates that HPWS has a double-edged sword effect on employees’radical creativity.The research contributes to extending the theory of whether and how HPWS has influence on employee creativity.
作者 魏巍 彭纪生 华斌 Wei Wei;Peng Jisheng;Hua Bin(School of Business and Management,Anhui University of Finance and Economics,Bengbu 233030;School of Business Nanjing University,Nanjing 210093)
出处 《管理评论》 CSSCI 北大核心 2020年第8期215-227,共13页 Management Review
基金 国家自然科学基金面上项目(71672083,71272097) 安徽省社会科学创新发展研究项目(2018CX034)。
关键词 高绩效人力资源系统 突破式创造力 资源保存理论 双刃剑 工作要求-资源模型 high performance work system radical creativity resource conservation theory double-edged sword job demands-resources model
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献113

  • 1张徽燕,何楠,李端凤,姚秦.高绩效工作系统量表开发——基于中国企业样本的研究[J].中国管理科学,2013,21(S1):46-51. 被引量:16
  • 2程德俊,赵曙明.高参与工作系统与企业绩效:人力资本专用性和环境动态性的影响[J].管理世界,2006,22(3):86-93. 被引量:116
  • 3李原,孙健敏.雇用关系中的心理契约:从组织与员工双重视角下考察契约中“组织责任”的认知差异[J].管理世界,2006,22(11):101-110. 被引量:117
  • 4孙健敏.(2006).高绩效工作系统.新资本(5),41-43.
  • 5Adkins, C. L., & Premeaux, S. F. (2012). Spending time: The impact of hours worked on work-family conflict. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80(2), 380-389.
  • 6Ang, S. H., Bartram, "IF., McNeil, N., Leggat, S. G., & Stanton, P. (2013). The effects of high-performance work systems on hospital employees' work attitudes and intention to leave: A multi-level and occupational group analysis. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24(16), 3086-3114.
  • 7Appelbaum, E., Bailey, T., Berg, P., & Kalleberg, A. L. (2000). Manufacturing advantage: Why high-performance work systems pay off. Ithaca, NY: Comell University Press.
  • 8Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2007). The job demands- resources model: State of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22(3), 309-328.
  • 9Barney, L (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120.
  • 10Becker, B. E., & Huselid, M. A. (1998). High performance work systems and firm performance: A synthesis of research and managerial implications. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 16, 53-101.

共引文献61

同被引文献400

引证文献27

二级引证文献102

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部