期刊文献+

急性冠脉综合征患者替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷相互转换治疗的现状调查分析 被引量:1

Current Application Status of Switching between Ticagrelor and Clopidogrel in Hospitalized Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:调查分析急性冠脉综合征(ACS)急性期或早期的患者在住院期间替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷相互转换的应用现状。方法:分析2019年6月~12月本院急性期或早期ACS患者院内替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷相互转换的发生率、一般临床特征、转换给药时间和给药剂量。结果:ACS患者替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷转换治疗的比率为12.9%(208/1607),最终纳入的182例患者中,63.2%(115例)由氯吡格雷换为替格瑞洛(升阶治疗组),36.8%(67例)由替格瑞洛换为氯吡格雷(降阶治疗组)。升阶组和降阶组的一般临床特征存在一定的差异;两组患者均在造影术后当天至术后第一天的时间段发生转换的人数最多,且组间存在差异(58.4%vs 40.0%,P=0.018);降阶组仅有35.5%的患者在最后一剂替格瑞洛给药24 h后给予首剂氯吡格雷;仅有37.4%的患者在转换时给予所换用P2Y12受体拮抗剂的负荷剂量。结论:"指南"推荐的P2Y12受体拮抗剂转换策略尚未得到广泛认可,临床实践中转换策略的制定须结合患者情况作个体化选择。 Objective: To investigate and analyze the clinical application of switching between ticagrelor and clopidogrel in hospitalized patients with acute coronary syndrome(ACS) in the acute/early phase.Methods: A retrospective analysis was done on incidence, general clinical characteristics, switching time and dosage of in-hospital switching between ticagrelor and clopidogrel in acute/early phase ACS patients from June to December 2019. Results: The occurrence of in-hospital switching between ticagrelor and clopidogrel was 12.9%(208/1607). Among the 182 patients who were finally included, 115(63.2%) patients switched from clopidogrel to ticagrelor(Escalation) and 67(36.8%) patients switched from ticagrelor to clopidogrel(De-escalation). The general clinical characteristics of the two treatment groups were somewhat different;the two different ways of transitions occurred more frequently in the period from the day after the angiography to the first day after the operation, and there were differences between the groups(58.4% vs.40.0%, P =0.018);only 35.5% of the patients in De-escalation were treated with the first dose of clopidogrel 24 h after the last dose of ticagrelor;only 37.4% of patients were given a loading dose of the switched P2Y12 receptor antagonist at the time of transition. Conclusions: The P2Y12 receptor antagonist transition strategy recommended by the guidelines has not been widely recognized, and the formulation of the transition strategy in clinical practice often depends on the situation of individual patient.
作者 陈瑾瑾 刘培延 赵拯 李园园 CHEN Jinjin;LIU Peiyan;ZHAO Zheng;LI Yuanyuan(Department of Pharmacy,Nanjing First Hospital,Nanjing 210006,China)
出处 《药学与临床研究》 2020年第4期289-292,共4页 Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research
基金 江苏省药学会-奥赛康医院药学基金项目(A201807)。
关键词 急性冠脉综合征 替格瑞洛 氯吡格雷 转换治疗 Acute coronary syndrome Ticagrelor Clopidogrel Switch
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献68

  • 1Wallentin L, Becker RC, Budaj A, et al. Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes[ J]. N Engl J Med, 2009, 361 ( 11 ): 1045-1057. DOI: 10. 1056/ NEJMou0904327.
  • 2Harem CW,Bassand JP, Agewall S, et al. ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: The Task Force for the management of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) [ J ]. Eur Heart J, 2011 , 32 ( 23 ) : 2999-3054. DOI : 10.1093/eurheartj/ebr236.
  • 3O'Gara PT, Kushner FG, Ascheim DD, et al. 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infaretion: a repart of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines[ J]. J Am Coll Cardiol,2013,61 (4) :e78-e140. DOI: 10. 1016/j. jacc. 2012.11. 019.
  • 4Windecker S, Kolh P, Alfonso F, et al. 2014 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization: The Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) Developed with the special contribution of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI) [J]. Eur Heart J,2014,35(37) :2541-2619. DOI:10. 1093/eurheartj/ehu278.
  • 5Amsterdam EA,Wenger NK, Brindis RG, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines[ J ]. Circulation, 2014,130 ( 25 ) : e344-e426. DOI : 10. 1161/CIR. 0000000000000134,.
  • 6Wallentin L, James S, Storey RF, et al. Effect of CYP2C19 and ABCBI single nucleotide polymorphisms on outcomes of treatment with tieagrelor versus clopidogrel for acute coronary syndromes:a genetic substndy of the PLATO trial [ J ]. Lancet, 2010. 376 (9749) : 1320-1328. DO1 : 10. 1016/S0140-6736 ( 10) 61274-3.
  • 7Li H, Butler K,Yang L, et al. Pharmacokinetics and tolerability of single and multiple doses of tieagrelor in healthy Chinese subjects : an open-label, sequential, two-cohort, single-centre study [ J]. Clin Drug Investig, 2012, 32 ( 2 ) : 87-97. DOI: 10. 2165/ 11595930.-000000000-00000.
  • 8Franchi F, Angiolillo DJ. Novel antiplatelet agents in acute coronary syndrome[ J]. Nat Rev Cardiol, 2015,1;2 ( 1 ) : 30-47. DOI : 10. 1038/nreardio. 2014. 156.
  • 9Bliden KP, Tantry US, Storey RF, et al. The eftect of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel on high on-treatment platelel reactivity: combined analysis of the ONSET/OFFSET and RESPOND studies [ J ]. Am Heart J,2011,162 ( 1 ) : 160-165. DOI : 10. 1016/j. ahj. 2010. 11.0:25.
  • 10Storey RF, Angiolillo D J, Patil SB, et al. Inhibitory effects of ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel on platelet function in patients with acute coronary syndromes:the PLATO (PLATelet inhibition and patient Outcomes) PLATELET substudy [J ]. J Am Coll Cardiol,2010,56( 18 ) :1456-1462. DOI: 10. 1016/j. jacc. 2010. 03. 100.

共引文献444

同被引文献13

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部