期刊文献+

FDI、碳排放与经济增长--基于“一带一路”沿线国家的面板ARDL模型实证分析 被引量:4

FDI,Carbon Emission and Economic Growth:Empirical Analysis of B&R Countries Based on Panel ARDL Model
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为了更好地融入全球经济,让世界搭上中国经济发展的“便车”,“一带一路”倡议的提出无疑给沿线国家带来了深远的影响。本文根据“一带一路”沿线43个国家1995—2014年的面板数据,就FDI、碳排放与经济增长构建面板自回归分布滞后模型。实证结果显示:(1)FDI与碳排放都促进了沿线国家的经济增长,并且具有长期的双向因果关系;(2)经济增长与能源使用效率在短期具有双向因果关系,经济增长带来的能源使用效率提高也因此抑制了一国的碳排放水平;(3)能源使用效率与碳排放之间存在长期双向因果关系,值得注意的是FDI与碳排放之间并不存在因果关系。以上结论也意味着,“一带一路”倡议并没有使沿线国家成为“污染避难地”,反而有助于沿线国家走上可持续发展道路。 In order to better integrate into the global economy and let the world catch the“free ride”of China’s economic development,the proposal of B&R initiative has undoubtedly brought profound influence to countries along the route.Based on the panel data of 43 countries along the B&R route from 1995 to 2014,this paper constructed the panel autoregressive distribution lag model on FDI,carbon emission and economic growth.The empirical results are realistic:(1)Both FDI and carbon emission promote the economic growth of the countries along the B&R route,and there is a bidirectional long-term causal nexus between them;(2)Economic growth and energy efficiency have a bidirectional causal nexus in the short term,and the improvement of energy efficiency brought by economic growth also restrains a country's carbon emission level;(3)There is a long-term bidirectional causal nexus between energy use efficiency and carbon emissions.It is worth noting that there is no causality between FDI and carbon emissions.The above conclusion also means that the B&R initiative did not make countries along the route“pollution refuge”,but helped those countries to develop sustainably.
作者 王政 Wang Zheng(College of Marxism,Shanghai University,Shanghai 200444,China)
出处 《石家庄铁道大学学报(社会科学版)》 2020年第3期17-26,共10页 Journal of Shijiazhuang Tiedao University(Social Science Edition)
关键词 FDI 碳排放 经济增长 面板ARDL 因果关系 FDI carbon emission economic growth panel ARDL model causality relationship
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献42

  • 1姚树洁,冯根福,韦开蕾.外商直接投资和经济增长的关系研究[J].经济研究,2006,41(12):35-46. 被引量:236
  • 2Alfaro, L., A.Chanda, S. Kalemli-Ozcan and S. Sayek.2004. FDI and Economic Growth: the Role of Local Financial Markets[J].Journal of International Economic Amsterdam, 64(1):89-112.
  • 3Arellano,M., O.Bover,1995. Another Look at the Instrumental Variable Estimation of Error-components Models [J]. Journal of Econometrics 68: 29-51.
  • 4Arellano, M., S. Bond,1991. Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations[J]. The Review of Economic Studies 58:277-297.
  • 5Balasubramanyam,V. N., M.Salisu, D.Sapsford,1996.Foreign Direct Investment and Growth in EP and IS Countries[J]. Economic Journal 106:92-105.
  • 6Blundell, R., S. Bond,1998. Initial Conditions and Moment Restrictions in Dynamic Panel-data Models[J]. Journal of Econometrics 87:115-143.
  • 7Borensztein, E.J. De Gregorie, Land Jong-Wang, L., 1998. How Does FDI Affect Economic Growth?[J]. Journal of International Economics, 45(1):115-135.
  • 8Campos, N., and Kinoshita, Y. 2002. Foreign Direct Investment as Technology Transferred: Some Panel Evidence from the Transition Economies[J]. The Manchester School,70(3):398-419.
  • 9Djankov, S. and Hoekman, B. 1999. Foreign Direct Investment and Productivity Growth in Czech Enterprises[J]. World Bank Economic Review, 14(1):49-64.
  • 10Easterly, W. 1993. How Much Do Distortions Affect Growth?[J]. Journal of Monetary Economics,32(2): 187-212.

共引文献50

同被引文献51

引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部