积极心理团体辅导视角下思想政治教育亲和力的缘起、生成与提升被引量：5

The Origin,Generation and Promotion of Affinity of Ideological and Political Education from the Perspective of Positive Psychological Group Counseling

下载PDF

导出

摘要亲和力是影响思想政治教育实效性的重要因素。当前思想政治教育中积极教育理念贫乏,教育内容人文性与时代性缺乏与积极教育环境缺少,导致思想政治教育亲和力效果减弱。从积极心理团体辅导的视角分析亲和力的生成机理,积极情绪与积极需要是其动力机制,积极人格形成的积极自我意识是其强化机制,积极心理情境与共情的教学情境是其保障机制。思想政治教育亲和力的提升需要定位优势教育理念与转换学业情绪以生成积极动力,优化教育内容与培养成长型思维以提升积极自我意识,构建平等的师生关系与亲密的同伴关系以营造积极教育环境。 Affinity is an important factor affecting the effectiveness of Ideological and political education.At present,ideological and political education is faced with dilemmas of the lack of positive education concept,the lack of humanistic and contemporary education content and the lack of positive education environment,which leads to the weakening of the affinity effect of Ideological and political education.This paper analyzes the formation mechanism of affinity from the perspective of positive psychological group counseling.Positive emotions and positive needs are its dynamic mechanism;positive self formed by positive personality is its strengthening mechanism;and positive psychological situation and empathy teaching situation are its guarantee mechanism.In order to improve the affinity of Ideological and political education,we need to position the advantageous education idea and change the academic emotion to generate positive motivation,optimize the education content and cultivate the growth thinking to enhance the positive self,and build equal teacher-student relationship and intimate peer relationship to create a positive education environment.

作者黄宗芬 Huang Zongfen

机构地区华南理工大学马克思主义学院广西大学马克思主义学院

出处《江苏高教》 CSSCI 北大核心 2020年第9期92-96,共5页 Jiangsu Higher Education

基金 2018年度教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金西部和边疆地区项目“积极心理学视域下高校思想政治教育的亲和力研究”(18XJC710003) 2018年度广西高校大学生思想政治教育理论与实践研究一般项目(2018LSZ007) 2015年广西教育厅高等教育教学改革工程专项(2015JGB111)。

关键词积极心理团体辅导思想政治教育亲和力 positive psychological group counseling ideological and political education affinity

分类号 G641 [文化科学—高等教育学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献3

1刘惊铎.体验:道德教育的本体[J].教育研究,2003,24(2):53-59. 被引量：150
2刘肖岑,王立花,朱新筱.自我提升的含义与研究[J].山东师范大学学报（人文社会科学版）,2006,51(3):145-148. 被引量：21
3刘晓亮,沈壮海.关键课程发挥关键作用——基于2014—2018年高校思想政治理论课建设调查数据的分析[J].中国高等教育,2019,0(9):27-30. 被引量：17

二级参考文献28

1[2]Sedikides,C.& Gregg,A.P.Portraits ofthe self[C].InM.A.Hogg & J.Cooper(Eds.),Sage handbook of social psychology.London:Sage Publications,2003.
2[3]Sedikides,C.Assessment,enhancement,and verification determinants of the self-evaluation process[J].Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1993.
3[4]Sedikides,C.& Strube,M.J.Self-evaluation:To thine own self be good,to thine own self be sure,to thine own self be true,and to thine own self be better[J].Advances in Experimental Social Psychology,1997.
4[5]Silvera,D.H.& Seger,C.R.Feeling good about ourselves:Unrealistic self-evaluations and their relation to self-esteem in the United States and Norway[J].Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology,2004.
5[6]Tesser,A.Toward a self-evaluation maintenance model of social behavior[C].In L.Berkowitz (Fd.),Advances in Experimental Social Psychology,1988.
6[7]Yik,M.,Bond,M.H.,& Paulhus,D.L.Do Chinese self-enhance or self-efface[J].Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,1998.
7[8]Paulhus,D.L.,Harms,P.D.,Bruce,M.N.,& Lysy,D.C.The Over-claiming technique:Measuring self-enhancement independant of ability[J].Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,2003,84(4).
8[9]Kwan,V.,John,O.P.,Kenny,D.A.,& Bond,M.H.Reconceptualizing individual differences in self-enhancement bias:An interpersonal approach[J].Psychological Review,2004,111 (1).
9[10]Paulhus,D.L.Socially desirable responding:The evolution of a construct[C].In H.Braun,D.N.Jackson,& D.E.Wiley (Eds.),The role of constructs in psychological and educational measurement.Hillsdale,NJ:Erlbaum,2002.
10[11]Forgas,J.P.,Bower,G.H.,& Moylan,S.J.Praise or blame? Affective influences on attributions for achievement[J].Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1990,59.