摘要
在现代风险社会,技术性风险所引发的犯罪问题正日益走强。技术风险犯罪主要表现为技术本身的负价值风险犯罪和技术工具价值风险犯罪两种类型。我国对技术风险犯罪尚没有形成有序的规制思路,试图通过刑法前移来封堵技术风险犯罪不但无法实现规制目的,而且因刑法的过度化前移而饱受批判。技术风险所展现的风险本质和技术性特征决定了技术风险犯罪需要依赖于早期风险管理,但对技术风险的控制必须兼顾技术自由价值。秩序和自由之间的价值平衡需求决定了技术风险犯罪的规制应该坚持双阶层规制路线,在多元技术主体之间进行风险责任的公平分配。
In modern risk society,the crime caused by typical technical risks is getting stronger and stronger.Technical risk crimes are mainly manifested in two types of crimes caused by the negative value risks of technology itself and the risks caused by the value risks of technical tools.China has not formed an orderly regulation of technology risk crimes.It is not only unable to achieve the purpose of the rules,but also has been criticized for the excessive moving forward of criminal law.The nature of the risks and technical characteristics of technical risks determine that technical risk crimes need to rely on early risk management,but the control of technological risk must take into account the value of technological freedom.The demand for value balance between order and freedom determines that the regulation of technical risk crimes should be based on the two tier regulatory lines and the fair distribution of risk responsibility of multiple technical subjects.
作者
肖扬宇
XIAO Yangyu(School of Law and Intellectual Property,Guangdong Polytechnic Normal University,Guangzhou,Guangdong 510450,China)
出处
《江西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2020年第4期66-73,共8页
Journal of Jiangxi Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)
基金
2018年最高人民检察院检察理论研究课题“海洋生态环境检察监督机制研究”(编号:GJ2018D42)。
关键词
风险社会
技术风险犯罪
现实展开
规制逻辑
治理革新
risk society
technology risk crimes
realistic development
regulation logic
governance innovation
