期刊文献+

美国科研诚信建设演变的制度逻辑与中国借鉴 被引量:10

System Logic of US Scientific Integrity Construction and its Inspiration to China
原文传递
导出
摘要 梳理美国科研诚信建设的阶段演进和制度逻辑,有助于精准把握中国科研诚信制度的当前阶段与制度目标。纵观美国科研诚信发展史,1981—1989的开创阶段重在正视科研不端行为,推动科研诚信建制化;1989—2000的规范化阶段重在惩治科研不端行为,推动调查规范化;2000—2010的成熟阶段重在预防科研不端行为,强制普及科研诚信教育;2010至今的科研生态体系阶段重在确保科研诚信。以此制度逻辑为鉴,当前中国科研诚信发展具有预防科研不端行为与健全科研生态体系的双阶段并存的建构难度,亟待科学共同体的全面深度参与,及科研服务机构纳入科研诚信主体等。 It is of vital for the studies of stages evolution and system logic for the history of American scientific integrity system.It could be helpful for China to get backwardness advantage,situating more accurately at its historic stage and system target.It is the evolution of four stages of US scientific integrity construction,during 1981-1989,the stage purpose is to face with scientific misconduct and propel for institutionalizing of scientific integrity.In 1989-2000,the stage target is to punish scientific misconduct,and to normalize scientific investigation.During 2000-2010,its aim is for the protection system from scientific misconduct,and compelling for scientific integrity education.From 2010 to now,the target is to guarantee scientific integrity,with system of healthy research ecology.Inspired by above analysis,Current Chinese scientific integrity system have two aims of protecting from scientific misconduct,as well as constructing research ecology system,so as to urge for more system innovations,such as research ecology construction to cover all bodies,especially scientific community’s deep interaction,taking research service institute into scientific integrity bodies,etc.
作者 王阳 WANG Yang(School of Philosophy and Social Development,Huaqiao University,Xiamen 361021,China)
出处 《自然辩证法研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2020年第7期52-58,共7页 Studies in Dialectics of Nature
关键词 美国科研诚信制度 历史阶段 制度逻辑 中国科研诚信建设 建制目标 scientific integrity system in American historical stage system logic scientific integrity construction in China institution target
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献30

  • 1威廉.A.布兰彼得.美国科学政策的法律和历史基础[J].科学学研究,2005,23(3):289-297. 被引量:17
  • 2东北财经大学公共政策研究中心.突发性公共事件中的政府应急能力建设-源于SARS危机的思考[R].2003.5.http://www.dufe.edu.cn/news/200305/images/2003052102.pdf.第17页
  • 3[日]山崎茂明.科学家的不端行为-捏造·篡改·剽窃[M].杨舰,程远远,严凌纳译.北京:清华大学出版社,2005.17,14.
  • 4Lawrence J Rhoades.ORI Closed Investigations into Misconduct Allegations Involving Research Supported by the Public Health Service:1994-2003[R].Office of Research Integrity,Office of Public Health and Science,Department of Health and Human Services.2004.
  • 5Davis H Guston.Between Politics and Science:Assuring the Integrityand Productivity of Research[M].Cambridge university press,12.
  • 6David P. Hamilton OSI:Better the devil you know [J].Science, 1992, 255:1 344
  • 7Howard K Schachman. What is misconduct in science [J].Science, 1993, 261:148-149
  • 8Joseph Palace. Changes in misconduct investigation planned[J].Nature, 1989, 338:189
  • 9David P. Hamilton can OSI withstand a scientific Backlash [J].Science, 1991, 253:1084-1086
  • 10Constance Holden. New rules- on misconduc [J]. Science,1989,246: 593

共引文献21

同被引文献91

引证文献10

二级引证文献32

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部