期刊文献+

化学品足迹法筛查电镀行业潜在高风险化学品 被引量:2

Application of Chemical Footprint Method in Screening of Potential High-Risk Chemicals in Electroplating Industry
下载PDF
导出
摘要 现代工业化学品带来了大量潜在的生态环境风险。目前,国内对工业化学品的风险识别、评估及管理等严重缺乏。本研究利用化学品足迹理想模型(USEtox),计算电镀行业化学品不同生命周期排放产生的生态毒性影响,筛选电镀行业潜在高风险化学品。结果显示,电镀行业使用的有机化学品中十二烷基硫酸钠的生态毒性足迹(chemical footprint,ChF)分值最高,为2.30×10^-2 PAF·km^3·a;在重金属中Cu2+的生态毒性足迹分值最高,为4.20 PAF·km^3·a。重金属生态毒性足迹显著高于有机化学品(>2个数量级)。因此,重金属是电镀行业主要高风险化学品,也是电镀行业最主要环境风险源。USEtox可用于定量表征行业化学品带来的区域环境风险,为以行业为单位开展工业化学品区域生态环境风险评估提供新思路。 Modern industrial chemicals may bring potential ecological environmental risks.However,at present,the risk identification,assessment and environmental management of industrial chemicals is insufficient in China.In this study,the ideal model based on chemical footprint,i.e.USEtox,was used to calculate the impact of ecotoxicity discharged in the different life circle of chemicals in the electroplating industry,and the environmental risk of chemicals in the industry was characterized and ranked.The results showed that the ecotoxicity footprint score of sodium dodecyl sulfate(2.30×10^-2 PAF·km^3·a)was the highest among the electroplating organic chemicals and the ecotoxicity footprint score of Cu^2+(4.20 PAF·km^3·a)was highest among the heavy metals.All heavy metals had significantly higher ecotoxicity footprint score(ChF)than that of organic chemicals(more than two orders of magnitude),and they can be considered as the main high-risk chemicals and the most important risk source from the electroplating industry.USEtox can be used to quantitatively characterize the impact of the ecotoxicity of industrial chemicals on regional environmental risks,providing a new idea for regional ecological environment risk assessment based on industrial chemicals.
作者 刘芸 赵旭 熊涵磊 胡小英 王炜 胡国成 温勇 Liu Yun;Zhao Xu;Xiong Hanlei;Hu Xiaoying;Wang Wei;Hu Guocheng;Wen Yong(State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Environmental Pollution Health Risk Assessment,South China Institute of Environmental Sciences,Ministry of Ecology and Environment of the People’s Republic of China,Guangzhou 510655,China)
出处 《生态毒理学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2020年第3期184-194,共11页 Asian Journal of Ecotoxicology
基金 国家重点研发计划课题(2018YFC1800304,2018YFC1801505) 生态环境部华南环境科学研究所中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务专项资助项目(2206030201500040028,PM-zx097-202002-074)。
关键词 化学品 电镀行业 化学品足迹 风险评估 chemical electroplating industry chemical footprint risk assessment
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献127

  • 1唐伟,孙晓怡.pH值对酚类化合物生物毒性的影响[J].黑龙江环境通报,2005,29(1):45-46. 被引量:12
  • 2汤菊莉,李宁,严卫星.食品中丙烯酰胺的毒理学研究现状[J].中国食品卫生杂志,2006,18(4):350-353. 被引量:7
  • 3[1]Sussman,J.L.; Harel,M.; Frolow,F.Science 1991,253,872.
  • 4[3]Soreq,H.; Seidman,S.Nat.Rev.Neurosci.2001,2,294.
  • 5[4]Porcelli,F.; Delfini,M.; Del Giudice,M.R.Bioorgan.Chem.1999,27,197.
  • 6[6]Xiang,J.; Liang,Y.; Chen,N.Acta Chim.Sinica 2003,61,1949 (in Chinese).(项瑾,梁毅,陈楠,化学学报,2003,61,1949.)
  • 7[8]Xie,X.-Y.; Wang,C.-X.; Wang,Z.-Y.Chin.J.Chem.2004,22,1257.
  • 8[9]Xie,X.-Y.; Wang,C.-X.; Wang,Z.-Y.J.Therm.Anal.Calorim.2004,77,1005.
  • 9[10]Xie,X.-Y.; Li,X.; Wang,Z.-Y.; Wang,C.-X.Thermochim.Acta 2004,414,19.
  • 10[11]Wang,Y.; Chen,C.H.Biophys.Chem.1992,43,51.

共引文献86

同被引文献24

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部