期刊文献+

SEC模型在高考中的应用与反思

Application and Reflection of SEC Model in College Entrance Examina
下载PDF
导出
摘要 随着高考改革不断深化,考试内容及命题方式也面临着新的变革。国家不再颁布统一的考试大纲,也不再编制考试说明,高考命题回归课程标准,命题内容设计以课程标准和高校人才选拔要求为依据。在这种背景下,高考试卷与课程标准的一致性成为衡量高考质量的重要指标。本研究以高考数学试卷为例,运用SEC模型分析试卷与课程标准的一致性并对SEC模型适用性进行反思,提出SEC模型在高考命题实践中的应用建议。 Both of test content and test development are facing new changes with the deepening of College Entrance Examination(CEE for short)reform.As the state stopped formulating unified CEE Outline as well as CEE Outline’s Explanation,test development of CEE would absolutely return to Curriculum Standard,which means that test construct setting will be based on Curriculum Standard and requirements for talent selection in colleges and universities.In this context,consistency between CEE and Curriculum Standard becomes an important quality indicator.Taking mathematics test as an example,this article employes Survey of Enacted Curriculum Model(SEC Model for short)to analyze consistency between CEE and Curriculum Standard,reflecting on the usability of SEC Model,and puts forward suggestions for using SEC Model in test development.
作者 田霖 韦小满 Tian Lin;Wei Xiaoman(Beijing Education Examinations Authority,Beijing,100083;Beijing Normal University,Beijing,100875)
出处 《考试研究》 2020年第4期38-45,共8页 Examinations Research
基金 北京市教育科学“十三五”规划2019年度重大课题“中高考改革背景下北京市教学、考试、招生一体化研究”(CAMA19055)的成果之一。
关键词 高考 命题 课程标准 一致性 SEC模型 College Entrance Examination Test Development Curriculum Standard Consistency Survey of Enacted Curriculum Model
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献22

  • 1刘学智,马云鹏.美国“SEC”一致性分析范式的诠释与启示——基础教育中评价与课程标准一致性的视角[J].比较教育研究,2007,28(5):64-68. 被引量:95
  • 2中华人民共和国教育部.基础教育课程改革纲要(试行)[DB/OL].http://www.moe.edu.cn2004—06—16.
  • 3Norman,L.Webb. Aligument of Science and Maths Standards and Assessments in Four States. Council of Chief State School Officers. Washington,DC August, 1999.23.
  • 4U.S.Congress.House of Representatives. Improving Americans Schools.Act.Washington. DC:U.S. Government Printing Office. 1994. 8.
  • 5Porter.How SEC.Measures Alignment.Educational Researcher, 1997(5):2,12,9,5,8.
  • 6Norman L.Webb. Criteria for Ahgnment of Expectation and Asses Sment in Maths and Science Education. Washington. DC :National Institute for Science Education University of Wisconsin- Madison and Council of Chief State School Officers, 1997.14-22.
  • 7Porter, A. C. Creating a System of School Process Indicators.Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1991, (1): 29.
  • 8中华人民共和国教育部制定.基础教育课程改革纲要(试行)(2001)[N].中国教育报,2001-7-21.
  • 9Jennings J.F. Why National Standards and Tests .9 Politics and Quest for Better Schools. SAGE Publication, 1998:66-72.
  • 10Porter A.C. Measuring the content of instruction : Uses in research and practice. Educational Researcher,2002, (7) :2-16.

共引文献460

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部