期刊文献+

当代生命技术与生命政治的联结——以罗斯生命政治论述为中心的考察 被引量:3

The Connection between Contemporary Life Technology and Life Politics: A Survey centered on Rose’s Life Politics
原文传递
导出
摘要 以分子生物学为基础的基因技术是当代生命技术的重要形式。当代生命技术重塑了人们关于生命的观念与对生命形式、生命质量的期许,罗斯从"生命本身的政治"视角探讨了当代生命技术召唤出来的主体政治与身份政治实践,建立了从希望技术到生物公民的理论进路。当代生命技术与生命政治实践的联结,既提出了生命政治的当代化问题,也建立了从生命政治视角讨论当代生命技术的议题与空间,来自技术的经验现实与生命政治理论的反思性、批判性可以形成互补的知识框架与辩证的讨论视角,从而推进当代生命技术的深入观察和当代生命政治理论的拓展。 Genetic technology based on molecular biology is an important form of contemporary life technology.It reshapes people’s concept of life,and the expectations of life form and life quality.From the perspective of"the politics of life itself",Nikolas Rose explored the subject politics and identity politics practice summoned by contemporary life technology,and established a theoretical approach from hope technology to biological citizenship.The connection between contemporary life technology and life political practice raises the issue of the contemporary transformation of life politics,and establishes the issues and space about contemporary life technology from the perspective of life politics.The empirical reality from technology and the reflective and critical character of life politics theory can form a complementary knowledge framework and dialectical discussion perspective,thereby promoting the in-depth observation about contemporary life technology and expanding the contemporary life politics theory.
作者 林秀琴 LIN Xiu-qin(Fujian Academy of Social Sciences,Fuzhou,Fujian 350001,China)
机构地区 福建社会科学院
出处 《自然辩证法研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2020年第8期62-68,共7页 Studies in Dialectics of Nature
关键词 生命技术 生物医学 基因编辑 生命政治 分子化 life technology biomedicine gene editing life politics molecularization
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献16

  • 1邱仁宗.生命伦理学[M].上海:上海人民出版社,1987.175.
  • 2克洛斯,2011年:《技术哲学:从外在进路到内在进路》,载潘恩荣《工程设计哲学--技术人工物的结构与功能之间的关系》,中国社会科学出版社.
  • 3Achterhuis, H. , 2001, American Philosophy of Technology: The Empirical Turn, Bloomington/Minneapolis: Indiana University Press.
  • 4Franssen, M. , G. Lokhorst and I. van de Poel, 2010, "Philosophy of technology", in E. N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
  • 5Kroes, P. , 1998, "Technological explanations: the relation between structure and function of technologica! objects", in Society for Philosophy and Technology 3 (3) .
  • 6Kroes, P. ,2002, "Design methodology and the nature of technical artefacts", in Design Studies 23 (3) .
  • 7Koes, P. and Meijers, A. , 2000, "Introduction: a discipline in search of its identity", in The Empirical Turn in the Philosophy of Technology, Amsterdam: JAI Press, Elsevier Science Ltd.
  • 8Mitcham, C. , 1994, Thinking Through Technology: The Path Between Engineering and Philosophy, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • 9Pitt, J. C. , 1995, "On the philosophy of technology, past and future", in Society for Philosophy and Technology 1 ( 1 - 2 ) .
  • 10Pitt, J. C. ,1999, Thinking About Technology: Foundations of the Philosophy of Technology, New York: Seven Bridges Press.

共引文献61

同被引文献51

引证文献3

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部