期刊文献+

温敏漆校准及图像后处理方法研究 被引量:2

The calibration and image post-processing method research of temperature-sensitive paint
下载PDF
导出
摘要 涂料校准误差是温敏漆实验技术中的重要误差源。针对国产615/EP配方温敏漆实施校准实验,系统研究了校准过程中涉及的CCD曝光时间,图像平均幅数,噪点的强度、体积和数量,图像清晰度和模数转换位数等技术参数对校准精准度的影响。研究结果表明:噪点的强度、体积和数量对涂料校准精准度影响很大。在噪点数量少、强度弱的取图区域中,图像清晰度对校准精准度影响很小,单幅图像即可保证校准精准度的要求。为了获得较高的校准精准度,对于滨松ORCA-R2型CCD相机,建议采集图像灰度值大于相机满井值的32%,同时要求温敏漆风洞实验与校准实验中采集图像的位数保持一致。 Temperature-sensitive Paint(TSP)calibration error is an important error source in the TSP experimental technique.Based on the domestic 615/EP TSP,the effects of some calibration technical details including the CCD exposure time,image average quantity,noise level,image definition and analog-to-digital(A/D)conversion digit on the calibration precision are studied.The research results show that,the image noise level has a significant effect on the calibration precision.In an image region of low noise level,the image definition and the image average quantity have less significant influence on the calibration precision.In order to obtain high-precision calibration results,the image gray should exceed 32%of the CCD full-well capacity for the Hamamatsu CCD camera,and the tunnel test and calibration test should have the same number of digits for the image A/D conversion.
作者 刘祥 熊健 马护生 周强 陈柳生 王红彪 黄辉 陈植 LIU Xiang;XIONG Jian;MA Husheng;ZHOU Qiang;CHEN Liusheng;WANG Hongbiao;HUANG Hui;CHEN Zhi(High Speed Aerodynamics Institute of China Aerodynamics Research and Development Center,Mianyang Sichuan 621000,China;Institute of Chemistry,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100190,China)
出处 《实验流体力学》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2020年第4期53-61,共9页 Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics
基金 国家自然科学基金(11172316)。
关键词 温敏漆 校准方法 校准误差 校准精准度 校准准则 TSP calibration method calibration error calibration precision calibration criterion
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献24

  • 1阮复昌,李向明,莫炳禄,公国庆,邓颂九.荧光猝灭反应的动力学[J].高校化学工程学报,1996,10(3):316-319. 被引量:8
  • 2Bounitch A, Lewis D R, Lafferty J F. Improved measurements of "tunnel noise" pressure fluctuations in the AEDC hypervelocity wind tunnel No. 9 [ C ]. 49th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, Orlando, USA, January 4 - 7, 2011.
  • 3Mee D J. Boundary layer transition measurements in hypervelocity flows in a shock tunnel [ C ]. 39th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Reno, USA, January 8-11, 2001.
  • 4Fujii K. An experiment of two dimensional roughness effect on hypersonic boundary-layer transition [ C ]. 43rd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, USA, January 10 -13, 2005.
  • 5Swanson E O, Schneider S P. Boundary-layer transition on cones at angle of attack in a Mach-6 quiet tunnel [ C ]. 48th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, Orlando, USA, January 4 - 7, 2010.
  • 6Juliano T J, Schneider S P. Instability and transition on the HIFiRE-5 in a Mach-6 quiet tunnel [ C ]. 40th Fluid Dynamics Conference and Exhibit, Chicago, USA, June 28 - July 1,2010.
  • 7Schultz D L, Jones T V. Heat-transfer measurements in short- duration hypersonic facilities [ R ]. Gt. Britain : University of Oxford, February 1973.
  • 8Liu T S, Sullivan J P. Pressure and temperature sensitive paints [M]. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, 2005.
  • 9Ruyten W. Real-time processing of pressure-sensitive paint ima- ges[R]. AEDC-TR-06-6, 2006.
  • 10Chou A, Ward C A, Letterman L E, et al. Transition research with temperature-sensitive paints in the Boeing/AFOSR Mach-6 Quiet tunffel[C]//41st AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference and Exhibit, AIAA 2011-3872.

共引文献27

同被引文献13

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部