期刊文献+

考虑群体一致性的区间犹豫模糊TOPSIS决策方法 被引量:6

Interval-Valued Hesitant Fuzzy TOPSIS Decision Making Method with Group Consistency
原文传递
导出
摘要 在区间犹豫模糊多属性决策问题中,针对区间犹豫模糊元中人为添加元素从而影响最终决策结果客观性的问题,文章提出一种基于群体一致性的区间犹豫模糊多属性决策方法.首先,根据区间犹豫模糊元中的元素个数以及元素间的差异定义区间犹豫度,并基于犹豫度定义了区间群体一致性;然后,基于群体一致性构建属性权重确定模型,并确定各属性的权重.最后,计算各备选方案到理想点的距离,运用TOPSIS方法对备选方案进行排序,并通过一个算例证明文章方法的可行性和有效性. In the interval-valued hesitant fuzzy multiple attribute decision making problems,this paper proposed an interval-valued hesitant fuzzy multiple attribute decision making method based on group consistency to solve the problem of artificially adding values into interval-valued hesitant fuzzy element which would affect the objectivity of final decision-making results.First of all,the interval-valued hesitant degree is defined according to the number of interval-valued hesitant fuzzy elements and the differences between interval-valued hesitant fuzzy elements,and the interval-valued group consistency is defined based on the hesitant degree.Then,the weight determination model based on group consistency is constructed to determine the weights vector.Finally,the distance between each alternative and the ideal point is calculated,and use TOPSIS method to rank all the alternatives.An example is given to demonstrate the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed method in this paper.
作者 梁薇 王应明 LIANG Wei;WANG Yingming(Decision Sciences Institute,Fuzhou University,Fuzhou 350116;Key Laboratory of Spatial Data Mining&Information Sharing of Ministry of Education,Fuzhou University,Fuzhou 350116)
出处 《系统科学与数学》 CSCD 北大核心 2020年第7期1146-1156,共11页 Journal of Systems Science and Mathematical Sciences
基金 国家自然科学基金(61773123)资助课题。
关键词 区间犹豫模糊元 区间犹豫度 区间群体一致性 TOPSIS 多属性决策方法 Interval-valued hesitant fuzzy elements interval-valued hesitant degree interval-valued group consistency TOPSIS multi-attribute decision making method
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献26

  • 1陈华友,刘春林,盛昭瀚.IOWHA算子及其在组合预测中的应用[J].中国管理科学,2004,12(5):35-40. 被引量:71
  • 2Brito A J, de Almeida A T, Mota C M M. A multi-criteria model for risk sorting of natural gas pipelines based on ELECTRETRI integrating utility theory [ J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2010, 200 (3) : 812- 821.
  • 3Petrovic M,Bojkovic N, Anic I,Stamenkovic M,Tarle S P. An ELECTRE-based decision aid tool for stepwisebenchmarking: an application over EU Digital Agenda targets[ J]. Decision Support System, 2014,59: 230-241.
  • 4Zadeh L A. Fuzzy sets[ J]. Information and Control, 1965,8(3) : 338-353.
  • 5Torra V. Hesitant fuzzy sets[ J]. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 2010,25(6) : 529-539.
  • 6Chen N , Xu Z S, Xia M M. Interval-valued hesitant preference relations and their applications to group decision making[ J].Knowledge-Based Systems, 2013,37: 528-540.
  • 7Benayoun R, Roy B , Sussmann B. ELECTRE : Une methode pour guider le choix en presence de points de vue multiplesSEMA( Metra International) [ J]. Direction Scientifique, Notre de travail, 1966,49.
  • 8Almeida A T. Multicriteria modelling of repair contract based on utility and ELECTRE I method with dependability and servicequality criteria[ J]. Annual Operation Research, 2005 , 138( 1 ) : 113-126.
  • 9Duckstein L, Gershon M. Multicriterion analysis of a vegetation management problem using ELECTRE-II [ J ]. AppliedMathematical Modelling, 1983 , 7(4); 254-261.
  • 10Raju K S, Duckstein L, Arondel C. Multicriterion analysis for sustainable water resources planning: a case study in spain[ J].Water Resource Management, 2000,14(6) : 435-456.

共引文献46

同被引文献66

引证文献6

二级引证文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部