摘要
在物本逻辑的方法论走到尽头的今天,犯罪参与理论的论战应当摆脱文本主义的局限,从而转向归责的视角。区分制与单一制的理论纠葛深刻揭示出其背后的归责逻辑的差异,前者所倡导的不法连带性、共犯从属性等共同归责原理无法契合规范论所倡导的目的理性,也与我国刑法确立的共犯体系格格不入。相对而言,单独归责路径强调结果归属的个别性,不仅更为贴合我国刑法中共同犯罪规定的归责立场,而且能够为各犯罪参与者的归责提供更为坚实的基础。
The methodology of material causationism has failed to reasonably interpret the system of criminal participation,therefore it is necessary to get rid of the limitation of textualism and turn to the perspective of imputation.The theoretical entanglement between the distinction system and the unitary system reveals the difference of the imputation logic behind them.The joint imputation principle advocated by the former,like the illegitimate joint and the subordination of the accomplice,can not fit teleology advocated by the normative theory,and is not compatible with the accomplice system established by China s criminal law.On the contrary,the individual imputation path emphasizes the individual attribution of the result,which not only conforms to the imputation position of joint crime in China s criminal law,but also provides a more solid foundation for the imputation of each criminal participant.
作者
钱日彤
Qian Ritong(School of Law,South China Normal University,Guangzhou 510006,Guangdong,China)
出处
《学术探索》
2020年第9期84-94,共11页
Academic Exploration
关键词
共同犯罪
区分制
单一制
单独归责
共同归责
joint crime
differentiated system
single system
individual imputation
joint imputation