期刊文献+

会阴无保护联合无痛分娩对自然分娩产妇盆底功能及SOD、MDA水平的影响 被引量:1

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨会阴无保护联合无痛分娩对自然分娩产妇盆底功能及SOD、MDA水平的影响。方法选择2018年2月至2020年1月江阴徐霞客医院接诊的40例产妇,以随机数字表法分为对照组和研究组,各20例。对照组产妇给予常规助产技术,研究组产妇给予会阴无保护联合无痛分娩技术。比较两组产妇第二产程时间、产后情况及新生儿Apgar评分;比较两组产妇产后盆底功能情况和产妇会阴损伤程度;比较两组产妇镇痛前、分娩后血清SOD、MDA水平。结果与对照组比,研究组产妇第二产程时间、住院时间均缩短,产后2 h出血量减少,VAS评分降低(P<0.05);与对照组比,研究组产妇Ⅰ度子宫脱垂、Ⅰ类肌纤维肌力>3级、Ⅱ类肌纤维肌力>3级产妇占比均升高,Ⅱ度子宫脱垂、Ⅰ类肌纤维肌力≤3级、Ⅱ类肌纤维肌力≤3级产妇占比降低(P<0.05);与对照组比,研究组产妇会阴完整比例升高(P<0.05);与镇痛前比,分娩后两组产妇血清SOD水平均升高,且研究组高于对照组;血清MDA水平降低,且研究组低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论会阴无保护联合无痛分娩技术应用于产妇分娩可有效调节血清SOD、MDA水平,降低机体应激反应,缩短产程时间和住院时间,减少产后出血量,降低产妇疼痛感和会阴损伤程度,还能有效保护盆底功能。
作者 张红
出处 《现代医学与健康研究电子杂志》 2020年第11期126-128,共3页 Modern Medicine and Health Research
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献76

  • 1Muir TW,Stepp KJ,Barber MD.Adoption of the pelvic organ prolapse quantification system in peer-reviewed literature.Am J Ob-stet Gyneco1,2003,189(6):1632-1635.
  • 2Bump RC,Mattiasson A,Bo K,et al.The standardization of terminol-ogy of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction [J].Am J Obstet Gynecol,1996,175(1):10-17.
  • 3Persu C,Chapple CR,Cauni V,et al.Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quanti-fication System(POP-Q)-a new era in pelvic prolapse staging.J Med Life,2011,4(1):75-81.
  • 4Visco AG,Wei JT,McClure LA,et al.Effect of examination tech-nique modifications on pelvic organ prolapse quantification(POP-Q) results.IntUrogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunt,2003,14(5):136-140.
  • 5Haya N,Seqev E,Younes G,et al.The effect of bladder fullness on evaluation of pelvic organ prolapse [J].Int J of Gynaecol Obstet,2012,118(1):24-26.
  • 6Woodforde JM,Merskey H. Some relationships between subjective measures of pain[J].{H}Journal of Psychosomatic Research,1972,(03):173-178.
  • 7Jensen MP,Chen C,Brugger AM. Interpretation of visual analog scale ratings and change scores:a reanalysis of two clinical trials of postoperative pain[J].{H}Journal of Pain,2003,(07):407-414.
  • 8Gallagher E J,Liebman M,Bijur PE. Prospective validation of clinically important changes in pain severity measured on a visual analog scale[J].{H}Annals of Emergency Medicine,2001,(06):633-638.
  • 9Gallagher E J,Bijur PE,Latimer C. Reliability and validity of a visual analog scale for acute abdominal pain in the ED[J].{H}American Journal of Emergency Medicine,2002,(04):287-290.
  • 10Fosnocht DE,Chapman CR,Swanson ER. Correlation of change in visual analog scale with pain relief in the ED[J].{H}American Journal of Emergency Medicine,2005,(01):55-59.

共引文献867

同被引文献7

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部