期刊文献+

脑卒中病人健康素养量表的编制及信效度检验 被引量:12

Development and reliability and validity test of the health literacy scale for stroke patients
下载PDF
导出
摘要 [目的]编制脑卒中病人健康素养量表,并进行信度及效度检验。[方法]根据文献回顾及对15例脑卒中病人访谈的结果构建脑卒中健康素养的条目池,经研究小组讨论及专家评定后形成量表初稿。采用量表初稿对144例脑卒中病人进行测评,通过测评结果检测量表的信效度,修改后形成量表终稿。[结果]最终形成包括3个维度、20个条目的脑卒中病人健康素养量表。量表水平的内容效度指数为0.96,探索性因子分析后,取样适切量数值为0.915,因子分析提取的3个公因子累计方差贡献率为73.899%,量表总的Cronbach'sα系数为0.929,各维度的Cronbach'sα为0.926~0.942,其折半信度为0.819,2周后测得重测信度为0.932。[结论]编制的脑卒中健康素养量表,具有较高的信度和效度,可用于脑卒中病人的健康素养水平的测评。 Objective:To develop a health literacy scale for stroke patients,and to test its reliability and validity.Methods:According to the literature review and the results of interviews with 15 stroke patients,the item pool of stroke health literacy was constructed.Then the first draft of the scale was formed after research team discussion and experts evaluatin.The first draft of the scale was used to evaluate 144 stroke patients in order to test the reliability and validity of the scale.The final draft of scale was formed after revision.Results:The formed health literacy scale for stroke patients contained 3 dimensions,involving 20 items.The content validity index of scale⁃level was 0.96.After exploratory factor analysis,kaiser meyer olkin was 0.915.Cumulative variance contribution rate of three common factors extracted by factor analysis was 73.899%.The total Cronbach'sαcoefficient of the scale was 0.929.The Cronbach'sαcoefficient of each dimension was from 0.926 to 0.942.And its half-reliability was 0.819.The test⁃retest reliability was 0.932 after 2 weeks.Conclusions:The constructed health literacy scale for stroke patients had high reliability and validity,which could be used to evaluate the health literacy level of stroke patients.
作者 刘纪汝 李娟 田芳 LIU Jiru;LI Juan;TIAN Fang(Guizhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Guizhou 550002 China)
出处 《护理研究》 北大核心 2020年第18期3220-3225,共6页 Chinese Nursing Research
基金 2017年中国留学基金委公派留学基金资助项目,编号:201708525063。
关键词 脑卒中 健康素养 量表 信度 效度 stroke health literacy scale reliability validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献23

  • 1任海,王凯珍,肖淑红,赵书祥,陈国强.论体育资源配置模式——社会经济条件变革下的中国体育改革(一)[J].天津体育学院学报,2001,16(2):1-5. 被引量:184
  • 2各类脑血管疾病诊断要点[J].中华神经科杂志,1996,29(6):379-380. 被引量:33029
  • 3Wynd CA,Schmidt B,Schaefer MA.Two quantitative approachesfor estimating content validity[J].Western J Nurs Res,2003,25(5):508–518.
  • 4Lindell MK,Brandt CJ,Whitney DJ.A revised index of interrateragreement for multi-item ratings of a single target[J].Appl PsycholMeasurem,1999,23(2):127–135.
  • 5Lawshe CH.A quantitative approach to content validity[J].Personne Psychol,1975,28(4):563–575.
  • 6Hambleton RK,Swaminathan H,Algina J,et al.Criterion-referencedtesting and measurement:Review of technical issues anddevelopments[J].Rev Educat Res,1978,48(1):11–22.
  • 7Martuza VR.Applying norm-referenced and criterion-referenced measurement in education[M].Boston:Allyn andBacon,1977:275–293.
  • 8Lynn MR.Determination and quantification of content validity[J].Nursing Res,1986,35(6):382–385.
  • 9Davis LL.Instrument review:Getting the most from your panel ofexperts[J].Appl Nurs Res,1992,5(4):194–197.
  • 10Polit DF,Beck CT.The content validity index:are you sure youknow what’s being reported?critique and recommendations[J].Res Nurs Health,2006,29(5):489–497.

共引文献34367

同被引文献152

引证文献12

二级引证文献33

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部