期刊文献+

美德伦理学:从宋明儒的观点看 被引量:1

Virtue Ethics from a Neo-Confucian Perspective
下载PDF
导出
摘要 与从美德伦理学的角度看宋明儒学,从而试图将后者看作是一种美德伦理学不同,从宋明儒的观点去看美德伦理学主要是看美德伦理学还存在什么缺陷、局限和问题,而宋明儒特别是二程、朱熹和王阳明,在克服这些缺陷、超越这些局限和解决这些问题方面是否能够有所作为。虽然这样的研究在广义上也算是一种比较哲学,但它不是在比较已经完成了的美德伦理学体系,而是在比较中促进美德伦理学自身的发展,而这种美德伦理学并不是西方历史上(事实上也不是中国历史上)某些伦理学形态的专利。在这个意义上,从宋明儒的观点看美德伦理学并不是用宋明儒的材料去解决西方美德伦理学的问题,因为这种说法隐含了这些问题不是宋明儒、儒家甚至中国哲学自身的问题。宋明儒能够解决西方哲学家没有甚至不能解决的这些美德伦理学的问题这个事实本身就表明,它们也是宋明儒、儒学甚至整个中国哲学本身的问题。 Unlike Neo-Confucianism seen as a form of virtue ethics,virtue ethics seen from the Neo-Confucian perspective primarily aims to see what defects,limitations,and problems virtue ethics has and how Neo-Confucians,especially the Cheng Brothers,Zhu Xi,and Wang Yangming,can help rectify these defects,go beyond these limitations,and solve these problems.Such a study may be regarded as a project in comparative philosophy.However,instead of comparing fixed and completed systems of virtue ethics,it aims to further develop virtue ethics through a trans-tradition approach,which is not patented by any historical form of virtue ethics developed in the West or in China.In this sense,Viewing virtue ethics from the Neo-Confucian point of view is not doing Western virtue ethics by drawing on the Neo-Confucian resources,as this implies that virtue ethics is a property of the Western philosophical tradition.The very fact that Neo-Confucians can make great contributions to the development of virtue ethics shows that it is also something that Neo-Confucians,Confucians in general,and even Chinese philosophers as a whole have been concerned with.
作者 黄勇 Huang Yong
出处 《四川大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2020年第5期28-38,共11页 Journal of Sichuan University:Philosophy and Social Science Edition
基金 国家社会科学基金重大项目“伦理学知识体系的当代重建”(19ZDA033)。
关键词 美德伦理学 儒学 二程 朱熹 王阳明 Virtue ethics Confucianism the Cheng Brothers Zhu Xi Wang Yangming
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献7

  • 1Nicholas H.Smith, Strong Hermeneutics: Contingency and Moral Identity (London and New York: Routledge, 1997).
  • 2David E. Kleimm, Hermeneutical Inquiry. Volume I: The Interpretation of Texts (Atlanta, Georgia: Scholars Press).
  • 3Hans-Georg Cadamer, Truth and Method, trans. by Joel C. Weinsheimer and Donald G. Marshall (New York: Continuum, 1993).
  • 4Richard Rorty, Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1979).
  • 5Wilfred Cantwell Smith, The Meaning and End of Religion (Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 1991 )
  • 6Wiflred Cantwell Smithe, Toward a World Theology (Philadelphia: The Westminster Press, 1981).
  • 7F.D.E. Schleiermacher, Hermeneutics: The Handwritten Manuscripts (Atlanta, Georgia: Scholars Press, 1986).

共引文献12

同被引文献16

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部