期刊文献+

“铁公鸡”扎根A股的影响因素研究——基于政策实施效应视角的实证研究

Research on the Influencing Factors of“Iron Rooster”Taking Roots in A-share Market:Empirical Research from the Perspective of Policy Implementation Effect
下载PDF
导出
摘要 2000年后,虽然国家陆续出台了五次分红监管政策以期治理国内股市分红的各种乱象,但时至今日,一大批长期一毛不拔的“铁公鸡”仍顽固地扎根在A股。文章通过对股市成立以来历次分红监管政策及其依存因素的研究发现,尽管定性式半强制分红政策及差异化分红监管政策能显著降低“铁公鸡”公司的占比,但所有的分红监管政策都不能显著提高既有“铁公鸡”公司的分配意愿。对政策实施效应依存因素的检验表明,仅有公开再融资需求和重大资本性支出能同时降低“铁公鸡”公司的占比并提高既有“铁公鸡”公司的分配意愿,盈利水平和ST的频率越高的公司成为“铁公鸡”的可能性越高,而成长性水平与“铁公鸡”公司占比呈显著负相关关系。 Although the government had successively introduced five dividend regulatory policies which aim at controlling the various chaos in the domestic stock market dividends since 2000,a large number of“iron roosters”are still stubbornly rooted in A-share market yet.According to the study of the dividend regulatory policies and their dependent factors since the establishment of A-share market,it is found that although qualitative semi-mandatory dividend policies and differentiated dividend regulatory policies can significantly reduce the proportion of“iron rooster”companies,all dividend regulatory policies cannot significantly increase the existing“iron rooster”companies’willingness to pay dividends.Examination of the dependent factors for the effect of policy implementation shows that only public refinancing needs and major capital expenditures can reduce the proportion of“iron rooster”companies and increase the existing“iron rooster”companies’willingness to pay dividends.The higher the profit level and the frequency of ST,the higher the probability of the company becoming an“iron rooster”.The level of growth and the“iron rooster”company’s proportion is significantly negatively related.
作者 郑蓉 ZHENG Rong(School of Management, Xihua University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610039, China)
出处 《宜宾学院学报》 2020年第8期1-11,20,共12页 Journal of Yibin University
基金 四川省社科基地项目(CJY18-07)。
关键词 “铁公鸡” 分红监管政策 股权再融资需求 “iron rooster” dividend regulatory policy equity refinancing demand
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献58

  • 1徐国祥,苏月中.中国股市现金股利悖论研究[J].财经研究,2005,31(6):132-144. 被引量:41
  • 2姜付秀,刘志彪.行业特征、资本结构与产品市场竞争[J].管理世界,2005,21(10):74-81. 被引量:165
  • 3连玉君,程建.不同成长机会下资本结构与经营绩效之关系研究[J].当代经济科学,2006,28(2):97-103. 被引量:162
  • 4魏明海,柳建华.国企分红、治理因素与过度投资[J].管理世界,2007,23(4):88-95. 被引量:455
  • 5西格尔,2007.《投资者的未来》,中译本,机械工业出版社.
  • 6肖星,陈晓,2002.《股利政策与外部股东保护》,《新经济环境下的会计与财务问题研讨会论文集》.
  • 7Aggarwal, R.K., and A.A., Samwick, 1999, "Executive Compensation, Strategic Competition, and Relative Performance Evaluation: Theory and Evldenee", Journal of Finance, 54(6): 1999--2043.
  • 8Ayers, B.C., C.B., Cloyd, and J. R., Robinson, 2002, "The Effect of Shareholder-Level Dividend Taxes on Stock Prices: Evidence from the Revenue Reconciliation Act of 1993", Accounting Review, 77(4) : 933--947.
  • 9Bhattacharya, S., 1979, "Imperfect Information, Dividend Policy, and 'The Bird in the Hand' Fallacy", Bell Journal of Economics, 10(1) : 259--270.
  • 10Bolton, P., and D., Scharfstein, 1990, "A Theory of Predation Based on Agency Problems in Financial Contracting", American Economic Review, 80(1): 93--106.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部