期刊文献+

专利实施许可合同履行不能时被许可人的法定救济路径研究——以《民法典》的适用为视角

Study of Statutory Remedies for Patent Licensees in Case of Impossibility of Performance of Patent Licensing Contracts—From the Perspective of Application of the Civil Code
下载PDF
导出
摘要 专利实施许可合同通常具有很强的技术性,这是其区别于其他诸如买卖合同、租赁合同等典型合同的重要特征。尽管有区别,专利实施许可合同本质上仍然是合同,同样可能遭遇履行障碍,一旦发生,在法律上就应当有相应的应对措施或手段。但是,也正是由于专利实施许可合同区别于其他合同的特点,导致其履行不能的情形具有一定的特殊性,尤其容易造成对被许可人权益的损害,因此有必要以其所特有的履行不能情形作为研究对象,以《民法典》下具体法律规则的适用为视角,逐一探寻和检视被许可人可以采取的法定救济路径。 Patent licensing contracts are usually highly technical,which is an important feature that distinguishes them from other typical contracts such as sales contracts and lease contracts.Despite the difference,patent licensing contracts are still contracts in nature and may also encounter impediments in performance,and in the event of such an occurrence taking place,there should be corresponding measures or means in law.However,it is precisely because of the characteristics of patent licensing contracts that are different from other contracts,there are certain particularities in the circumstances of impediments in performance of patent licensing contracts.The rights and interests of the licensees are highly likely to be damaged.Therefore,it is necessary to take the specific circumstances of impossibility of performance of patent licensing contracts as the study object,to explore and examine the statutory remedies available to the licensees one by one from the perspective of the application of the specific legal rules of the Civil Code.
作者 李擘 LI Bo(Unitalen Attorneys At Law(Shanghai Office),Shanghai 200041)
出处 《中国发明与专利》 2020年第9期88-95,共8页 China Invention & Patent
关键词 专利许可 履行障碍 实体主张 损害赔偿 patent licensing impediments in performance entity claims damages
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献15

  • 1罗春,陈庆.合同法和侵权法的边界——加害给付:合同责任?侵权责任?[J].西南政法大学学报,2005,7(1):98-104. 被引量:10
  • 2王荣珍.对加害给付概念与救济的再思考[J].政法论坛,2005,23(5):173-181. 被引量:11
  • 3程永顺.中国专利诉讼[M].北京:知识产权出版社,2006:533.
  • 4《中华人民共和国台同法》第344条.
  • 5《最高人民法院关于审理技术合同纠纷案件适用法律若干问题的解释》第二十六条规定.
  • 6《最高人民法院关于审理技术合同纠纷案件适用法律若干问题的解释》第34条规定.
  • 7370 U,S. 29 (196.).
  • 8440 U. S. 257 (1979).
  • 9《最高人民法院关于审理技术合同纠纷案件适用法律若干问题的解释》第26条规定.
  • 10王泽鉴.《债法原理》(第一册)[M].中国政法大学出版社,2002年版.第193页.

共引文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部